What absorbs at 2325 cm⁻¹ in an FTIR spectrum?
A band near 2325 cm⁻¹ can point to several functional groups. Below are the most likely assignments, ranked by how much published evidence supports each — every one traceable to literature (DOI) and cross-validated against our 130,000+ reference spectra and knowledge graph.
Backed by 4 cited sources
Quick answer
A band near 2325 cm⁻¹ is usually interpreted by checking which functional groups repeatedly co-occur there in the literature, then confirming at least one or two additional peaks in the same sample. This page ranks those assignments by accumulated evidence rather than by a single fixed textbook rule.
Возможные назначения функциональных групп
| Функциональная группа | Подтверждающие факты | Цитируемые источники | Максимальная достоверность |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water (H2O) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Hydroxyl (O-H) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Methacrylate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ketone | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ester | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Carboxyl (COOH) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Carbonyl (C=O) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Amide | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Acetate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
Ранжирование отражает накопленные литературные данные, а не единственное авторитетное правило. Всегда проверяйте в контексте вашего образца.
Possible materials
| Материал | Поддерживающие пики | Overlapping groups | Цитируемые источники |
|---|---|---|---|
| bio-based | 2325, 1720, 1740 | Methacrylate, Hydroxyl (O-H) | 1 |
Materials are shown only when the same literature pool supports this band and at least one additional characteristic peak.
Spectrum logic
This band becomes meaningful only when read with its neighboring peaks. In practice, analysts first look at the assignments above, then check whether the same sample also shows other peaks expected for the same structural motif. A lone band near 2325 cm⁻¹ is usually not enough for material identification by itself.
Real-world usage
This type of query is common in polymer identification, unknown plastic screening, QC troubleshooting, recycled-material verification, and literature-backed peak assignment review.
Common mistakes
- Treating one isolated band as proof of a material without checking at least one or two supporting peaks.
- Ignoring overlap: multiple functional groups can contribute near the same wavenumber.
- Skipping validation when additives, blends, oxidation, or contamination may distort the spectrum.
Verification advice
When ambiguity remains, validate the hypothesis with DSC, GC-MS, or TGA, especially for blends, degraded samples, and filled polymers.
Литература, лежащая в основе этих назначений
-
Acetate достоверность 1,0
“assigned to stretching vibrations of O-H and cm-1 N-H bond, peak at 2890 corresponding to saturated cm-1 C-H stretching vibration, peak at 2325 assigned to cm-1 C=O, band at 1617 corresponding to N=N azo”
Biodegradation and decolorization of azo dyes by adherent Staphylococcus lentus strain DOI: 10.1007/s13765-016-0169-4 -
Hydroxyl (O-H) достоверность 1,0
“Hernándeza false positive band (2325 as well as absorption of cm-1) Hierro et al., 2013) and phenolic compounds (Cozzolino gaseous N (2330 (Socrates, 2001).”
Nel 等 - 2022 - Attempted Identification of Causal Constituents of DOI: 10.21548/43-1-4812 -
Water (H2O) достоверность 1,0
“The peaks at 2325 and 3554 were assigned to the vibration of two non- ammable gaseous: CO and water vapor, respectively.”
Xu 等 - 2022 - Durable and high-efficiency casein-derived phospho DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-884727/v1 -
достоверность 0,7
“Same as above.”
Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from agricultural wastes and their ability to remove chlorpyrifos from water DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.01.011
Есть спектр с этой полосой?
Загрузите свой FTIR-спектр и получите полный отчет об интерпретации — назначение пиков с цитированием литературы, совпадения с библиотекой и цепочку доказательств с оценкой достоверности — за секунды.