What absorbs at 2127 cm⁻¹ in an FTIR spectrum?
A band near 2127 cm⁻¹ can point to several functional groups. Below are the most likely assignments, ranked by how much published evidence supports each — every one traceable to literature (DOI) and cross-validated against our 130,000+ reference spectra and knowledge graph.
Backed by 4 cited sources
Quick answer
A band near 2127 cm⁻¹ is usually interpreted by checking which functional groups repeatedly co-occur there in the literature, then confirming at least one or two additional peaks in the same sample. This page ranks those assignments by accumulated evidence rather than by a single fixed textbook rule.
Iespējamie funkcionālo grupu piešķīrumi
| Funkcionālā grupa | Atbalstošie fakti | Citētie avoti | Augstākā pārliecība |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carboxyl (COOH) | 2 | 2 | 1,0 |
| Methacrylate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ketone | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ester | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Carbonyl (C=O) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Amide | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Acetate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
Rangs atspoguļo uzkrātos literatūras pierādījumus, nevis vienu autoritatīvu noteikumu. Vienmēr apstipriniet atbilstoši parauga kontekstam.
Possible materials
| Materiāls | Atbalstošie pīķi | Overlapping groups | Citētie avoti |
|---|---|---|---|
| HPMC | 2127, 1640, 1550 | Methacrylate, Ketone, Carboxyl (COOH) | 1 |
| TiO | 2127, 1730, 1699 | Methacrylate, Carboxyl (COOH) | 1 |
| silver nanoparticles | 2127, 1636, 1631 | Methacrylate | 1 |
Materials are shown only when the same literature pool supports this band and at least one additional characteristic peak.
Spectrum logic
This band becomes meaningful only when read with its neighboring peaks. In practice, analysts first look at the assignments above, then check whether the same sample also shows other peaks expected for the same structural motif. A lone band near 2127 cm⁻¹ is usually not enough for material identification by itself.
Real-world usage
This type of query is common in polymer identification, unknown plastic screening, QC troubleshooting, recycled-material verification, and literature-backed peak assignment review.
Common mistakes
- Treating one isolated band as proof of a material without checking at least one or two supporting peaks.
- Ignoring overlap: multiple functional groups can contribute near the same wavenumber.
- Skipping validation when additives, blends, oxidation, or contamination may distort the spectrum.
Verification advice
When ambiguity remains, validate the hypothesis with DSC, GC-MS, or TGA, especially for blends, degraded samples, and filled polymers.
Literatūra aiz šiem piešķīrumiem
-
Acetate pārliecība 1,0
“The peaks at 2127 correspond to C=O stretching vibrations of”
Hieu 等 - 2022 - Microorganism-mediated green synthesis of silver n DOI: 10.15251/DJNB.2022.171.359 -
Carboxyl (COOH) pārliecība 1,0
“HPMC showed peaks at 1516 cm-1 and 1055 cm-1 due to pluronic acid spectra showed peaks at 2127 1516 and 1102 due to the absorption band of C-O ether linkage and stretching of the C-O-C group [29].”
Nanocrystals of Mangiferin Using Design Expert: Preparation, Characterization, and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation DOI: 10.3390/molecules28155918 -
pārliecība 1,0
“Obviously, a high-frequency band at observed on the calcined 5%Cu-5%Fe/SiO sample, which corresponds to CO linearly 2127 cm-1 was observed on the calcined 5%Cu-5%Fe/SiO2 sample, which corresponds to 2”
CuO-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles Supported on SiO2 and Al2O3 for Selective Hydrogenation of 2-Methyl-3-Butyn-2-ol DOI: 10.3390/catal11050625 -
pārliecība 0,9
“Explicit assignment in text.”
The Influence of Base Metal (M) Oxidation State in Au-M-O/TiO2 Systems on Their Catalytic Activity in Carbon Monoxide Oxidation DOI: 10.3390/catal2010038
Vai jums ir spektrs ar šo joslu?
Augšupielādējiet savu FTIR spektru un dažu sekunžu laikā iegūstiet pilnu interpretācijas ziņojumu — maksimumu piešķīrumus ar literatūras atsaucēm, bibliotēku saskaņošanu un pārliecības līmeņa pierādījumu ķēdi.