What absorbs at 1791 cm⁻¹ in an FTIR spectrum?
A band near 1791 cm⁻¹ can point to several functional groups. Below are the most likely assignments, ranked by how much published evidence supports each — every one traceable to literature (DOI) and cross-validated against our 130,000+ reference spectra and knowledge graph.
Backed by 3 cited sources
Quick answer
A band near 1791 cm⁻¹ is usually interpreted by checking which functional groups repeatedly co-occur there in the literature, then confirming at least one or two additional peaks in the same sample. This page ranks those assignments by accumulated evidence rather than by a single fixed textbook rule.
Iespējamie funkcionālo grupu piešķīrumi
| Funkcionālā grupa | Atbalstošie fakti | Citētie avoti | Augstākā pārliecība |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methacrylate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ketone | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ester | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Carboxyl (COOH) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Carbonyl (C=O) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Amide | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Acetate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ring structure | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Anhydride | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| N-O bond | 1 | 1 | 0,9 |
Rangs atspoguļo uzkrātos literatūras pierādījumus, nevis vienu autoritatīvu noteikumu. Vienmēr apstipriniet atbilstoši parauga kontekstam.
Possible materials
| Materiāls | Atbalstošie pīķi | Overlapping groups | Citētie avoti |
|---|---|---|---|
| polyethylene | 1791, 1737, 1720 | Methacrylate, Carboxyl (COOH) | 1 |
Materials are shown only when the same literature pool supports this band and at least one additional characteristic peak.
Spectrum logic
This band becomes meaningful only when read with its neighboring peaks. In practice, analysts first look at the assignments above, then check whether the same sample also shows other peaks expected for the same structural motif. A lone band near 1791 cm⁻¹ is usually not enough for material identification by itself.
Real-world usage
This type of query is common in polymer identification, unknown plastic screening, QC troubleshooting, recycled-material verification, and literature-backed peak assignment review.
Common mistakes
- Treating one isolated band as proof of a material without checking at least one or two supporting peaks.
- Ignoring overlap: multiple functional groups can contribute near the same wavenumber.
- Skipping validation when additives, blends, oxidation, or contamination may distort the spectrum.
Verification advice
When ambiguity remains, validate the hypothesis with DSC, GC-MS, or TGA, especially for blends, degraded samples, and filled polymers.
Literatūra aiz šiem piešķīrumiem
-
Anhydride pārliecība 1,0
“In the FTIR spectrum of LDPE/TPS composite at 400-4000 cm(cid:1)1 cm(cid:1)1 two main transmission peaks of 1791 and 1714 related to anhydride ring of coupling agent disappeared and a cm(cid:1)1 is formed.”
Physical and thermal mechanical properties of corn starch/LDPE composites DOI: 10.1002/app.37877 -
Acetate pārliecība 1,0
“A smaller peak at 1791 could 340 perhaps be assigned to C=O stretching of a 'free' non-H-bonded acid, however the wavenumber is 341 higher than that typically observed;”
Campen 等 - 2022 - Thermal degradation of n-hexadecane base oil and i DOI: 10.1007/s11249-019-1182-7. -
N-O bond pārliecība 0,9
“Shoulder assigned to ν(NO) vibration.”
A Structural Model for the Iron–Nitrosyl Adduct of Gentisate Dioxygenase DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201800992
Vai jums ir spektrs ar šo joslu?
Augšupielādējiet savu FTIR spektru un dažu sekunžu laikā iegūstiet pilnu interpretācijas ziņojumu — maksimumu piešķīrumus ar literatūras atsaucēm, bibliotēku saskaņošanu un pārliecības līmeņa pierādījumu ķēdi.