RESULT PAGE

Polyolefin-based material with possible halogenation and oxygenated/aromatic enclosures

View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.

Result No.: 20251001162113632814129 Owner: publicuser Comments: 0
FTIR Analysis Report Low confidence

Polyolefin-based material with possible halogenation and oxygenated/aromatic enclosures

Sample & Measurement Parameters

Report No. 20251001162113632814129
Date
Spectral Range (cm⁻¹) N/A
Baseline AsLS baseline correction
Library match 33%

Identification Result

33%

The FTIR spectrum reveals a multi-component organic material with a dominant aliphatic hydrocarbon character, supported by strong C-H stretching bands at 2954, 2914, and 2847 cm⁻¹ and bending vibrations at 1465 and 1377 cm⁻¹. A peak at 720 cm⁻¹ has been directly attributed to C-Cl stretching [7], indicating some halogen content. The presence of a distinct carbonyl band at 1706 cm⁻¹ and C-O-C stretching features near 1096–1111 cm⁻¹ points to oxidation or ether-containing additives. Aromatic ring modes at 1574 and 1537 cm⁻¹ further complicate the composition. While the top library hit suggests chlorinated polyethylene, the overall spectral evidence is better described as a mixed aliphatic material with probable halogenation, oxidation, and aromatic contaminants or additives FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.

Detailed interpretation

  • Top library match: Chlorinated polyethylene #1
  • The carbonyl band at 1706 cm⁻¹ and the aromatic features at 1537–1574 cm⁻¹ are incompatible with a pure chlorinated polyethylene; they indicate additional chemical constituents.
  • Several candidate peak assignments suggest inorganic or biological entities (e.g., amphibole, milk fat, zinc nanoparticles) that do not match the overall organic polymeric character.
  • The exact nature of the halogen and the type of carbonyl/ether compounds remain unresolved without complementary techniques (e.g., XRF, GC-MS).
  • The low spectral library similarity (0.00) and the heterogeneous evidence across literature sources prevent definite identification of a single compound or polymer.

Recommended next steps: Perform elemental analysis (e.g., XRF or EDX) to confirm the presence and identity of halogens (Cl, Br) and oxygen content. Use solvent extraction or pyrolysis-GC/MS to separate and identify the aromatic and oxygenated minor components. Compare with reference spectra of pure chlorinated polyethylene and polyethylene to assess spectral differences attributable to oxidation or blending.

Library Comparison

Library spectrum will appear here.

Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates

Rank Match % Compound SMILES Spectrum No. Action
Loading library candidates...

Peak Analysis

★ = Literature-supported assignment
# Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) Absorbance Assignment Citation Assignment status
1 · 2914 1.00 - - -
2 · 1537 0.93 - - -
3 · 1465 0.84 - - -
4 · 2847 0.79 - - -
5 · 1574 0.73 - - -
6 · 1417 0.51 - - -
7 · 1433 0.47 - - -
8 · 720 0.45 - - -
9 · 667 0.35 - - -
10 · 1275 0.29 - - -
11 · 1211 0.27 - - -
12 · 1096 0.26 - - -
13 · 2954 0.25 - - -
14 · 1111 0.24 - - -
15 · 963 0.22 - - -
16 · 1377 0.22 - - -
17 · 1706 0.20 - - -
18 · 830 0.20 - - -
19 · 2163 0.12 - - -
20 · 2006 0.11 - - -
21 · 2071 0.10 - - -

Appendix — Raw Spectrum

Raw sample spectrum
Generated by FTIR.fun — Report #20251001162113632814129
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

Submit Requirement Form