RESULT PAGE

aromatic / sulfate

View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.

Result No.: 20250804181207658540737 Owner: publicuser Comments: 0
FTIR Analysis Report Low confidence

aromatic / sulfate

Sample & Measurement Parameters

Report No. 20250804181207658540737
Date
Spectral Range (cm⁻¹) N/A
Baseline AsLS baseline correction
Library match 29%

Identification Result

29%

The FTIR spectrum is most consistent with an aromatic matrix containing sulfate or sulfonate groups, showing weak similarity to pyridine-4-carboxylic acid (library match 0.0). Additional spectral features point to the presence of cellulose-like polysaccharides and polystyrene-like aromatic components, indicating a composite or mixed organic material FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.

Detailed interpretation

  • Top library match: pyridine-4-carboxylic acid #324
  • No clear evidence is observed for the pyridine ring N–H stretching or the strong carbonyl peak expected for a pure pyridine-4-carboxylic acid, and the library similarity is effectively zero, urging caution against a single‑component interpretation.
  • The extent of contribution from polysaccharide, polystyrene, and inorganic phases cannot be deconvoluted from the current data; the exact stoichiometry and morphology of the composite remain undetermined.
  • Sulfate assignments, while chemically plausible, rely on group‑frequency correlations and library trends rather than on a single, unequivocal spectral marker.

Recommended next steps: Acquire an elemental analysis (e.g., EDX or XPS) to confirm the presence of sulfur and silicon and to estimate the organic/inorganic ratio. Perform solvent extraction or pyrolysis‑GC‑MS to separate and identify the polystyrene‑like and cellulose‑like fractions. Record Raman spectra to verify aromatic ring modes and to distinguish sulfate vibrations from alternative C‑O‑C contributions.

Library Comparison

Library spectrum will appear here.

Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates

Rank Match % Compound SMILES Spectrum No. Action
Loading library candidates...

Peak Analysis

★ = Literature-supported assignment
# Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) Absorbance Assignment Citation Assignment status
1 · 2144 1.00 - - -
2 · 1078 1.00 - - -
3 · 2112 1.00 - - -
4 · 897 1.00 - - -
5 · 2057 1.00 - - -
6 · 1048 1.00 - - -
7 · 1178 1.00 - - -
8 · 806 1.00 - - -
9 · 2065 0.21 - - -
10 · 2049 0.21 - - -
11 · 798 0.21 - - -
12 · 814 0.21 - - -
13 · 2119 0.21 - - -
14 · 1941 0.20 - - -
15 · 1185 0.20 - - -
16 · 2104 0.20 - - -
17 · 1170 0.20 - - -
18 · 2137 0.19 - - -
19 · 1085 0.19 - - -
20 · 1041 0.19 - - -
21 · 904 0.19 - - -
22 · 1070 0.19 - - -
23 · 1056 0.19 - - -
24 · 889 0.19 - - -

Appendix — Raw Spectrum

Raw sample spectrum
Generated by FTIR.fun — Report #20250804181207658540737
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

Submit Requirement Form