RESULT DISCUSSION PAGE

Results20241012210455918689762

The formal analysis report is shown first. The discussion thread below is reserved for follow-up questions, evidence, and replies.

Result No.: 20241012210455918689762 Owner: publicuser Comments: 1
FTIR ANALYSIS REPORT

Spectrum Analysis Result

No.: 20241012210455918689762 Date: 2024-10-12 18:07:03 Reported by: FTIR.fun Contact: [email protected]

Download a professional, formatted PDF of this analysis.

Historical stored result

none

Historical stored result
#15866 Initial rank 1 Current rank 1 Library lead match 0.0%
Key Findings
  1. Historical stored result loaded without the current FTIR reasoning contract. Direction/entity/aggregate evidence was not generated for this record.
Evidence

Conclusion evidence

Only evidence already present in the current result contract is shown here.

Library lead candidate LIB
none #15866 | match 0.0%
Peak reading

Characteristic peak interpretation

Each peak is rewritten as a single readable sentence. KG rows show literature citation labels, and LLM rows show the current LLM confidence tier.

No structured characteristic-peak reading was produced for this record.

Reasoning

Reasoning chain

This section explains how the current conclusion was reached from the available evidence.

  1. Historical stored result loaded without the current FTIR reasoning contract. Direction/entity/aggregate evidence was not generated for this record.
Risk

Uncertainty and blockers

These items limit how far the current conclusion can be trusted or refined.

  • Historical stored result loaded without the current FTIR reasoning contract. Direction/entity/aggregate evidence was not generated for this record.
Recommendation

Recommended next steps

These are the next verification actions suggested by the current reasoning output.

  • Re-run this sample with the current FTIR reasoning chain if you need a current conclusion.
Reference workbench

Curve comparison and library verification

Use the workbench below to manually verify the report conclusion against the selected library curves and Top15 candidates.

Choose matching result groups:
Library spectrum loads when this workbench opens.
Move across the sample curve to inspect your sample values.
Library spectrum Interactive sample curve Move the pointer to show the vertical guide line.
Top 15 candidates

Reference library candidates

This list is a verification appendix. It helps you compare nearby candidates without repeating the report conclusion.

Rank Match % Compound Name Formula / SMILES Library preview Action
Reference candidates load when this verification workbench opens.
Appendix A

Detected peak table

All detected peaks are kept here as a single appendix instead of being repeated across multiple cards.

Index Wavenumber Transmittance (%) Sources One-line interpretation KG citation LLM confidence
1 709 1.00 - 709 cm-1: possible source: Refer to AI conclusion. - -
2 3421 0.70 - 3421 cm-1: possible source: Refer to AI conclusion. - -
3 972 0.69 - 972 cm-1: possible source: Refer to AI conclusion. - -
4 3547 0.53 - 3547 cm-1: possible source: Refer to AI conclusion. - -
5 1637 0.27 - 1637 cm-1: possible source: Refer to AI conclusion. - -
6 3652 0.26 - 3652 cm-1: possible source: Refer to AI conclusion. - -
7 2023 0.20 - 2023 cm-1: possible source: Refer to AI conclusion. - -
Appendix B

Sample information and raw spectrum

The raw uploaded spectrum is retained here for audit and manual review.

Baseline correction method: Asymmetric Least Squares Smoothing

The wavelength range for analysis(cm-1): [(650, 4000)]

Raw spectrum without baseline correction or other processing:

Raw spectrum image
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

The large and flat peaks around 1630 and 3300 indicate the presence of water, while the absorption peaks at 3547 and 3652 suggest that the sample may be similiar to hydrous minerals more closely[1].The fingerprint region cannot be precisely matched to a specific mineral, appearing to be predominantly composed of metal hydroxides.
[1]Balan, Etienne, et al. "Surface modes in the infrared spectrum of hydrous minerals: the OH stretching modes of bayerite." Physics and Chemistry of Minerals 35 (2008): 279-285.

en&2
Submit Request Form