methoxy/methacrylate-rich organic-inorganic hybrid material
View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
methoxy/methacrylate-rich organic-inorganic hybrid material
Sample & Measurement Parameters
Identification Result
70%The library search returned Calcium carbonate as the closest single match, but the Top‑15 candidate consensus and the sample’s spectral features indicate a strong presence of oxygen‑rich organic functional groups (methoxy/methacrylate, carbonyl). Direct peak evidence supports both organic moieties (C=O, C‑O‑C, alkyl C‑H) and inorganic components (metal‑oxygen, carbonate). The combination suggests the sample is a composite material, not a single pure compound, rendering a precise identification uncertain. The material direction is therefore defined broadly as a methacrylate/ester‑rich organic‑inorganic hybrid FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.
Detailed interpretation
- Top library match: Calcium carbonate #141341
- The top library match is calcium carbonate, an inorganic material, yet the dominant spectral features are organic. This indicates that the sample is not pure calcium carbonate, and a simple library identification is misleading.
- The exact organic polymer type and the ratio of inorganic to organic components cannot be determined solely by FTIR. The material could be a filled polymer or a mixture of carbonate and organic residues.
Library Comparison
Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates
| Rank | Match % | Compound | SMILES | Spectrum No. | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading library candidates... | |||||
Peak Analysis
★ = Literature-supported assignment| # | Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) | Absorbance | Assignment | Citation | Assignment status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | · | 1461 | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| 2 | · | 1489 | 0.83 | - | - | - |
| 3 | · | 1430 | 0.80 | - | - | - |
| 4 | · | 1202 | 0.79 | - | - | - |
| 5 | · | 1130 | 0.78 | - | - | - |
| 6 | · | 995 | 0.77 | - | - | - |
| 7 | · | 1303 | 0.75 | - | - | - |
| 8 | · | 1162 | 0.74 | - | - | - |
| 9 | · | 1360 | 0.74 | - | - | - |
| 10 | · | 1265 | 0.73 | - | - | - |
| 11 | · | 857 | 0.71 | - | - | - |
| 12 | · | 1332 | 0.68 | - | - | - |
| 13 | · | 1045 | 0.65 | - | - | - |
| 14 | · | 1382 | 0.64 | - | - | - |
| 15 | · | 806 | 0.60 | - | - | - |
| 16 | · | 1558 | 0.55 | - | - | - |
| 17 | · | 1688 | 0.46 | - | - | - |
| 18 | · | 747 | 0.45 | - | - | - |
| 19 | · | 718 | 0.42 | - | - | - |
| 20 | · | 1707 | 0.40 | - | - | - |
| 21 | · | 664 | 0.26 | - | - | - |
| 22 | · | 580 | 0.22 | - | - | - |
| 23 | · | 557 | 0.20 | - | - | - |
| 24 | · | 3136 | 0.18 | - | - | - |
| 25 | · | 451 | 0.16 | - | - | - |
| 26 | · | 483 | 0.13 | - | - | - |
| 27 | · | 3375 | 0.12 | - | - | - |
| 28 | · | 2861 | 0.11 | - | - | - |
| 29 | · | 3597 | 0.11 | - | - | - |
| 30 | · | 2038 | 0.08 | - | - | - |
| 31 | · | 2165 | 0.08 | - | - | - |
| 32 | · | 1983 | 0.07 | - | - | - |
| 33 | · | 2190 | 0.07 | - | - | - |
| 34 | · | 2998 | 0.07 | - | - | - |
| 35 | · | 2327 | 0.06 | - | - | - |
| 36 | · | 2935 | 0.06 | - | - | - |
| 37 | · | 3204 | 0.04 | - | - | - |
| 38 | · | 420 | 0.01 | - | - | - |
Appendix — Raw Spectrum
Comments and follow-up evidence
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.