Ep 06 — Functional Groups and Characteristic Absorption Frequencies (Part 2): C-H, C≡N, C-O-C, etc.

Series: Infrared Spectroscopy Encyclopedia: From Principles to Practice
Chapter: Part 1 · Introduction — The Code of Light
Target Audience: High school students, undergraduate students, beginners in chemistry/materials/pharmacy
Prerequisites: Ep 04 (How to Read an Infrared Spectrum), Ep 05 (Functional Groups and Characteristic Absorption Frequencies Part 1)
Reading Time: Approximately 25 minutes

Introduction: The Chemical World Behind the "Boundary Line" at 3000 cm⁻¹

In the previous episode, we covered the "three stars" of infrared spectroscopy — C=O, O-H, N-H. Today, we widen our lens to explore functional groups that, though not as dominant as C=O, each tell a story of molecular structure [1][2]:

• C-H stretching vibrations (2800–3300 cm⁻¹): Seemingly ordinary, but encode hybridization patterns
• C≡C and C≡N triple bonds (2100–2260 cm⁻¹): Stand out in a "clean" region
• C-O-C ether and C-O alcohol/ester (1000–1300 cm⁻¹): Strong peaks in the fingerprint region
• NO₂ nitro group (~1550 and ~1380 cm⁻¹ doublet): Rare "equal-intensity doublet"
• C-X halogen bonds (500–1400 cm⁻¹): Most intuitive demonstration of Hooke's law

A simple "3000 cm⁻¹ boundary line" reveals the hybridization of carbon atoms; an "isolated peak in the triple bond region" immediately identifies alkynes or nitriles. These principles are the core arsenal that makes infrared spectroscopy a "molecular detective".

🔗 Want to verify? The functional groups covered in this episode can be searched directly on ftir.fun:

• C-H stretching: ftir.fun/ir/group/alkyl-c-h
• Alkene C=C: ftir.fun/ir/group/alkene
• Aromatic rings: ftir.fun/ir/group/aromatic
• Ether bonds: ftir.fun/ir/group/ether
• Nitro groups: ftir.fun/ir/group/nitro
• C-F: ftir.fun/ir/group/fluorine

1. C-H Stretching Vibrations: The "Codebook" of Hybridization

1.1 3000 cm⁻¹ as a Key Boundary

All C-H stretching vibrations are concentrated in the 2800–3300 cm⁻¹ region. Within this seemingly narrow window lies an empirical rule known to every chemist [1][2][3]:

3000 cm⁻¹ is the boundary:

• Below 3000 cm⁻¹ → sp³ hybridized C-H (alkanes)
• Above 3000 cm⁻¹ → sp² hybridized C-H (alkenes, aromatic rings)
• ~3300 cm⁻¹ → sp hybridized C-H (terminal alkynes)

Why does this rule hold? The answer lies in the s-character proportion of hybrid orbitals (see Section 1.5).

1.2 sp³ Hybridized C-H (Alkanes) — 2850–3000 cm⁻¹

Alkane C-H stretching is one of the most common absorptions in infrared spectra. Since most organic compounds contain sp³ C-H, these peaks usually serve as "reference information" rather than "characteristic identification peaks" [3][4].

Specific frequencies are as follows [1][3][5]:

Table 1: Breakdown of sp³ C-H Stretching Frequencies (Data source: LibreTexts [1], Maricopa lecture notes [3])

Important rule: Asymmetric stretching frequencies are always higher than symmetric — a general principle of molecular vibrational dynamics, also applicable to functional groups with equivalent bonds such as NH₂, NO₂, CH₂ [5].

🔗 In-depth verification: Complete peak data for methyl and methylene are available at ftir.fun methyl group page and ftir.fun methylene group page.

Associated bending vibrations (fingerprint region reference) [1][3]:

• C-H scissoring: 1470–1450 cm⁻¹
• C-H rocking (methyl): 1370–1350 cm⁻¹
• Long-chain CH₂ in-plane rocking: 725–720 cm⁻¹ (used to determine chain length, see Ep 07)

📷 Figure 1: IR spectrum of n-octane, showing typical sp³ C-H stretching cluster
Source: LibreTexts Organic Chemistry [1]
https://chem.libretexts.org/@…

1.3 sp² Hybridized C-H (Alkenes and Aromatic Rings) — 3000–3100 cm⁻¹

Alkene =C-H Stretching

Alkene =C-H stretching: 3020–3100 cm⁻¹, appearing as a sharp, medium-intensity peak [3][6].

Since this absorption lies on the "high wavenumber side" of 3000 cm⁻¹, even when the C=C absorption (1640–1680 cm⁻¹) is weak or absent (C=C may be IR inactive in symmetric alkenes), the =C-H absorption above 3000 cm⁻¹ can reveal the presence of the double bond [6][7].

Aromatic Ar-H Stretching

Aromatic C-H stretching: ~3030 cm⁻¹, weak absorption, typically slightly higher than alkene =C-H; aromatic compounds often exhibit several bands [1][3].

Other associated absorptions of aromatic rings [1][3]:

• Weak overtones/combination bands in the 2000–1665 cm⁻¹ region (often used for substitution pattern determination, see Ep 07)
• In-ring C=C stretching: 1600–1585 cm⁻¹ and 1500–1400 cm⁻¹ (2–3 bands)
• C-H out-of-plane bending (oop): 900–675 cm⁻¹ (used for substitution type determination, see Ep 07)

🔗 In-depth verification: Functional group data for alkenes and aromatic rings can be found at ftir.fun alkene page and ftir.fun aromatic page.

1.4 sp Hybridized C-H (Terminal Alkynes) — ~3300 cm⁻¹

Terminal alkyne ≡C-H stretching: 3250–3350 cm⁻¹ (often around ~3300 cm⁻¹), appearing as a strong and sharp absorption peak [3][8].

This sharp peak at 3300 cm⁻¹ is highly diagnostic for terminal alkynes — because the C≡C absorption at 2100–2260 cm⁻¹ is often very weak or absent due to symmetry, but as long as a terminal hydrogen exists, this characteristic sharp peak appears at 3300 cm⁻¹ [8][9].

Key identification point: Although the 3300 cm⁻¹ region overlaps with O-H and N-H, the alkyne C-H peak shape is sharp and narrow, contrasting sharply with the "broad and rounded" envelope of hydrogen-bonded O-H [3].

📷 Figure 2: IR spectrum of 1-hexyne, showing the strong sharp ≡C-H peak at 3324 cm⁻¹ and the medium C≡C peak at 2126 cm⁻¹
Source: OrgChemBoulder tutorial (University of Colorado Boulder) [9]

https://www.orgchemboulder.co…

1.5 Aldehyde C-H – Doublet at 2720 and 2820 cm⁻¹ (Fermi Resonance)

The C-H stretch of the aldehyde group –CHO produces a characteristic doublet [1][3][6]:

• Higher band: ~2820 cm⁻¹
• Lower band: ~2720 cm⁻¹ (more commonly used for identification, as almost no other functional group absorbs here)

Mechanism of Fermi Resonance

The aldehyde C-H doublet arises from Fermi resonance: the fundamental frequency of the aldehyde C-H stretching vibration is energetically close to the first overtone or combination band of the C-H bending vibration (in-plane bending). They couple to produce two new absorption bands instead of one [10][11].

This mechanism has been experimentally confirmed in studies in the Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2 (Chadwick et al. on thiophene-2-carbaldehyde) and in the Journal of Physical Chemistry A (on 5-chlorosalicylaldehyde) [10][11].

Diagnostic value: Since almost only the aldehyde group absorbs in the 2700–2730 cm⁻¹ range, this doublet is one of the most reliable diagnostic features for aldehydes. Combined with the C=O stretch at 1720–1740 cm⁻¹, it confirms the presence of an aldehyde group [3][6].

1.6 Why Decreasing Frequency: sp > sp² > sp³? – Physical Origin of s Character

This is the most profound rule in the C-H region. Understanding it requires revisiting the harmonic oscillator formula from Ep 02 [12][13]:

$$\nu = \frac{1}{2\pi c}\sqrt{\frac{k}{\mu}}$$

For a C-H bond, the reduced mass μ is nearly identical (fixed atomic masses of carbon and hydrogen), so the frequency is primarily determined by the force constant k.

Key point: The more s character in the hybrid orbital, the closer the orbital is to the carbon nucleus, resulting in a shorter, stronger C-H bond with a larger force constant and higher stretching frequency [7][14][15].

Table 2: Relationship between hybridization and C-H frequency (Data sources: Pearson textbooks [14][15], Peking University "University Chemistry" [12])

Physical explanation highlights [7][14]:

1. s orbitals are closer to the nucleus: s orbitals are spherical, with electron density closer to the nucleus than p orbitals. Increased s character reduces the effective orbital radius, binding the bonding electrons more tightly.
2. Bond length decreases: Bond lengths follow sp³ > sp² > sp (ethane 1.09 Å → ethylene 1.07 Å → acetylene 1.06 Å), reflecting increasing bond strength [14].
3. Force constant increases: Shorter, stronger bonds have higher electron density and stronger internuclear attraction, so the force constant increases in the order sp³ < sp² < sp [13].
4. Frequency increases: From the vibrational frequency equation, a larger force constant gives a higher frequency [7][15].

💡 Connection to acidity: The same rule explains why sp C-H is much more acidic than sp³ C-H (alkynes pKa ~25, alkanes pKa ~50). More s character increases the effective electronegativity of carbon, making the C-H bond more polar and the hydrogen more easily dissociated [16].

2. Triple Bond Region: The "Exclusive Stage" for C≡C and C≡N

2.1 Why is the Triple Bond Region "Clean"?

Infrared spectra are typically divided into four regions [2][3][20]:

Table 3: Four main regions of the mid-infrared (Data sources: Vanderbilt University [13], LibreTexts [2])

The triple bond region (2100–2300 cm⁻¹) is relatively "clean" for three reasons [2][3][9]:

1. High selectivity: Only bonds with bond order = 3 (triple bonds) or cumulated double bonds (which have high-frequency vibrations) appear in this region. Ordinary single bonds (C–C, C–O, C–N) and double bonds (C=C, C=O) vibrate at significantly lower frequencies.
2. Triple bonds are relatively rare in organic molecules: Most common organic compounds (alkanes, alcohols, ketones, acids, esters, amines, etc.) have no characteristic absorption in this region.
3. CO₂ interference band (2349 cm⁻¹): The asymmetric stretch of atmospheric CO₂ is the most common "background interference" in this region, which is why FTIR instruments usually require background subtraction.

"The –C≡C– stretching appears between 2260–2100 cm⁻¹, which can serve as an important diagnostic tool because very few organic compounds absorb in this region."
— OrgChemBoulder Tutorial [9]

2.2 C≡C Alkyne Stretch – 2100–2260 cm⁻¹

The stretching vibration of the C≡C triple bond appears in the 2100–2260 cm⁻¹ region, with intensity strongly dependent on molecular symmetry [1][3][9]:

Table 4: IR activity and symmetry of alkynes (Data sources: OrgChemBoulder [9], CSUN lecture notes [14])

Key insight (echoing the dipole moment rule from Ep 03):

• Terminal alkyne: one end is H, the other is R, asymmetric structure → large dipole moment change → strong IR activity [9].
• Symmetric internal alkynes (e.g., 4-octyne, 3-hexyne, 2-butyne): identical substituents at both ends, the dipole moment change during C≡C stretching is zero → IR inactive, no observable absorption peak [9].
• This is one of the classic examples of "symmetry forbidden" transitions discussed in Ep 03.

Experimental data [9][21]:

• 1-hexyne: ≡C-H ~3324 cm⁻¹ (strong, sharp), C≡C ~2119–2126 cm⁻¹ (medium)
• 1-octyne: ≡C-H ~3313 cm⁻¹, C≡C ~2119 cm⁻¹
• Phenylacetylene: ≡C-H ~3300 cm⁻¹, C≡C ~2100 cm⁻¹

2.3 C≡N Cyano Group – 2220–2260 cm⁻¹

The stretching vibration of the nitrile group (–C≡N) falls between 2220–2260 cm⁻¹, appearing as a sharp, medium-intensity absorption peak [6][22][23]:

Table 5: C≡N frequencies of nitriles (Data sources: Spectroscopy magazine [22], NIST [23])

Mechanism of Frequency Decrease by Conjugation

When C≡N is conjugated with an aromatic ring or C=C bond [6][22]:

• Conjugation delocalizes the π electrons of the C≡N bond into the aromatic ring, reducing the bond order and force constant of the C≡N bond, thus decreasing the vibrational frequency by about 20–40 cm⁻¹.
• At the same time, conjugation enhances the polarity of the –C≡N bond (more pronounced charge separation), resulting in a larger dipole moment change, thereby increasing the peak intensity.

Typical example: The C≡N stretch of benzonitrile appears at ~2230–2240 cm⁻¹ (conjugation lowers it relative to aliphatic nitriles), and its intensity is generally higher than that of aliphatic nitriles [6][24].

2.4 Why are C≡N peaks stronger than C≡C peaks?

Returning to the IR selection rule from Ep 03: IR absorption intensity depends on the rate of change of the dipole moment during vibration, dμ/dx [6][22].

• C≡C bond: Both ends are carbon atoms, with an electronegativity difference of 0. Even for terminal alkynes, the dipole moment change arises only from the asymmetry of C–H and C–R, resulting in a small value, so absorption is weak.
• C≡N bond: Nitrogen's electronegativity (3.04) is significantly higher than carbon's (2.55), giving an electronegativity difference of about 0.5. The C≡N bond has considerable polarity (dipole moment ~3.5 D), and stretching vibration causes a large change in dipole moment, i.e., large dμ/dx, so IR absorption is much stronger than for C≡C.

"The carbon–nitrogen triple bond is relatively polar, producing a large dμ/dx value upon stretching, hence the high intensity of the C≡N stretch peak."
—— Brian C. Smith, Spectroscopy magazine [22]

"C–N triple bond absorptions are usually very strong because the associated dipole moment is very large; C–C triple bond absorptions are usually weak (the bond dipole moment is very small)."
—— Arizona State University lecture notes [25]

📷 Figure 3: IR spectrum of acetonitrile, showing the C≡N stretch peak at 2252 cm⁻¹
Source: NIST Chemistry WebBook [23]
https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/…

III. C-O-C Ether Bonds and C-O Alcohols/Esters: "Strong Peak Representatives" in the Fingerprint Region

3.1 Ether C-O-C —— 1000–1300 cm⁻¹

Ethers (R-O-R′) are difficult to identify unambiguously in infrared spectra because the C-O single bond stretching vibration falls in the 1000–1300 cm⁻¹ range, overlapping with absorptions of many other functional groups [1][31]. However, ether molecules lack strong polar bonds such as O-H or C=O, so the C-O-C stretching vibration is the most diagnostic characteristic peak of ethers [1][2].

Ether C-O-C bonds have two basic stretching modes [2]:

• Asymmetric stretch: One C-O bond lengthens while the other shortens, causing a significant dipole moment change, producing a strong and prominent absorption band, the most diagnostic peak.
• Symmetric stretch: Both C-O bonds lengthen or shorten simultaneously, resulting in a smaller dipole moment change and weak absorption, often difficult to identify.

Aliphatic ethers —— ~1120 cm⁻¹ (strong)

For saturated aliphatic ethers, the most characteristic absorption is a single strong band corresponding to the C-O-C asymmetric stretch, appearing in the 1150–1070 cm⁻¹ range [2][3].

Specific examples [2][3]:

• Diethyl ether (CH₃CH₂OCH₂CH₃): Strong characteristic peak at approximately 1122 cm⁻¹ (BenchChem data); UC Davis Heffern textbook gives 1117 cm⁻¹.
• Dibutyl ether: Strong peak near 1100 cm⁻¹, arising from C-O stretching.

Aryl ethers and vinyl ethers —— ~1250 cm⁻¹ (conjugation effect)

When the ether oxygen is connected to an sp² hybridized carbon (aromatic ring or vinyl group), the lone pair electrons of oxygen conjugate with the π system, giving the C-O bond partial double bond character, increasing the force constant, and shifting the stretching frequency to higher wavenumbers [2][5].

• Aryl-alkyl ethers (e.g., anisole): Show two strong C-O stretching absorption bands [1][6]:

  • Asymmetric aryl-O stretch: 1275–1200 cm⁻¹ (typically ~1250 cm⁻¹)
  • Symmetric alkyl-O stretch: 1050–1010 cm⁻¹ (typically ~1050 cm⁻¹)

  "Phenyl alkyl ethers show two strong C-O stretching absorptions at 1050 and 1250 cm⁻¹."
  —— LibreTexts (McMurry textbook) [1]

• Vinyl ethers: Due to conjugation, the asymmetric C-O stretch lies at 1225–1200 cm⁻¹ [2].

• Naphthyl ethers: Due to the extended π system of the naphthalene ring providing stronger resonance stabilization, the C-O bond is stronger, and the asymmetric stretch lies at 1275–1250 cm⁻¹ (slightly higher than phenyl ethers) [7].

Epoxides (three-membered cyclic ethers) —— characteristic three bands

Three-membered oxirane rings exhibit unique, highly characteristic three bands due to severe ring strain [8][9]:

Table 6: Characteristic absorptions of epoxide three-membered rings (data source: Spectroscopy Online [8])

Example: In the spectrum of 1,2-epoxybutane, three characteristic peaks are observed [8]:

• 1261 cm⁻¹ (symmetric ring breathing)
• 904 cm⁻¹ (asymmetric C-O-C stretching)
• 831 cm⁻¹ (symmetric C-O-C stretching)

Common diagnostic peaks in epoxy resin studies are 915 cm⁻¹ and 830 cm⁻¹ (γ_C-O epoxy), used to monitor ring-opening reactions [9].

🔗 Further reference: For functional group data on ether bonds and methoxy groups, see ftir.fun ether page and ftir.fun methoxy page.

3.2 Alcohol C-O stretch —— 1000–1260 cm⁻¹

In addition to the broad strong O-H stretch (3300–3400 cm⁻¹), alcohols also exhibit a strong C-O stretching absorption, roughly near 1050 cm⁻¹, with the exact position varying depending on the substitution level (primary/secondary/tertiary) and whether it is a phenol [10][11][12].

IR lecture notes by Prof. Kalyan Kumar Mandal at St. Paul's C.M. College (Kolkata) clearly assign the C-O stretch region to 1260–1000 cm⁻¹ [13]:

Table 7: C-O frequencies increase with substitution level (data source: Mandal lecture notes [13], organica1.org [15])

Reason for frequency increase [13]:

• Alkyl groups are electron-donating; more alkyl groups change the electron density distribution of the C-O bond, altering the force constant.
• Simultaneously, vibrational coupling between C-O stretching and C-C stretching (e.g., in ethanol, C-O and C-C coupling produces asymmetric C-C-O stretching) varies with coupling mode, leading to frequency differences.

Characteristics of phenols: The C-O stretch of phenols, due to conjugation with the aromatic ring (similar to aryl ethers), shifts up to ~1230 cm⁻¹, significantly higher than aliphatic alcohols [10][13].

3.3 Distinguishing Ester C-O from Ether

Esters (-COO-) have two key IR absorptions [3][12][17]:

1. C=O stretch (carbonyl): 1750–1735 cm⁻¹ (strong, sharp) – this is the most diagnostic peak of esters [17].
2. C-O stretch: 1300–1000 cm⁻¹, actually two bands:

• Asymmetric C-O stretching: 1300–1200 cm⁻¹ (strong)—often called "ester C-O stretch"
  • Symmetric C-O stretching: 1150–1000 cm⁻¹ (medium-strong)
  • The appearance of two C-O stretching bands is characteristic of esters [17].

Key distinction between esters vs ethers:

Table 8: IR distinction between ethers and esters (data from LibreTexts [3], rt-students.com [17])

Key difference: Esters have a strong C=O peak at 1735–1750 cm⁻¹, while ethers do not; this is the most direct method to distinguish esters from ethers [3][17].

3.4 Why is the C-O region so wide (300 cm⁻¹ span)?

The C-O stretching frequency ranges from 1000 to 1300 cm⁻¹, a span of 300 cm⁻¹. The main reasons are as follows [2][5][13][16]:

① Conjugation effect (most significant factor)

When a C-O bond is conjugated with a π system (aromatic ring, C=C, C=O), the lone pair electrons on oxygen delocalize into the π* orbital, giving the C-O bond partial double bond character [2][5]:

• Bond length shortens, force constant k increases
• Vibrational frequency ν ∝ √k, thus shifts to higher wavenumber

Example comparison [2][5]:

• Aliphatic ether C-O-C: 1150–1070 cm⁻¹ (no conjugation)
• Anisole aryl-O: 1275–1200 cm⁻¹ (conjugation, shift up by ~100–150 cm⁻¹)
• Diphenyl ether: 1300–1200 cm⁻¹ (double conjugation, higher)
• Naphthyl ether: 1275–1250 cm⁻¹ (extended π system, higher than phenyl ether)

② Inductive effect

Electron-withdrawing groups raise the frequency of adjacent bonds, while electron-donating groups lower it [16].

• In esters (—C(=O)—O—R), C-O is conjugated with the carbonyl and affected by induction; its frequency lies in the upper part of 1300–1000 cm⁻¹ (1200–1300 cm⁻¹).
• This explains why valeric acid (carboxylic acid) C-O is at 1220 cm⁻¹, while 1-hexanol C-O is at 1060 cm⁻¹: the carboxylic acid C-O has partial double bond character due to resonance with the carbonyl, resulting in a higher frequency [19].

③ Substitution level (primary, secondary, tertiary alcohols)

See Section 3.2, alcohol C-O frequency increases with substitution level: primary ~1050 < secondary ~1100 < tertiary ~1150 [13][15].

④ Ring strain

Cyclic ethers show significant frequency changes due to ring strain affecting the C-O bond force constant [8]:

• Common cyclic ethers (tetrahydrofuran, etc.): regular range
• Three-membered epoxides: low wavenumber strong bands at 950–810 and 880–750 cm⁻¹ (ring deformation), plus a ring breathing band at 1280–1230 cm⁻¹.

3.5 "Functional group information" in the fingerprint region

The 1000–1300 cm⁻¹ region falls within the fingerprint region, but C-O stretching still provides valuable functional group information [1][3][20]:

1. High absorption intensity: C-O bonds are highly polar; stretching vibrations are accompanied by significant dipole moment changes, producing strong absorption bands that are often the strongest in the region, making them easy to identify [13][16].
2. Regular frequency range: Different types of C-O (alcohols, ethers, esters, acids, anhydrides) have relatively fixed subregions, which can be assigned in combination with information from other regions.
3. Aid in identification: By combining the presence/absence of O-H (3200–3600 cm⁻¹) and C=O (1735–1750 cm⁻¹) bands, C-O assignments can be confirmed within the fingerprint region [1][3]:
   • If a strong peak at 1050 cm⁻¹ and broad O-H at 3300 cm⁻¹ → primary alcohol
   • If a strong peak at 1120 cm⁻¹ with no O-H or C=O → aliphatic ether
   • If a strong peak at 1250 cm⁻¹ and C=O at 1735 cm⁻¹ → ester

📷 Figure 4: IR spectrum of ethanol, showing broad O-H at 3322 cm⁻¹ and C-O stretch at 1113 cm⁻¹
Source: LibreTexts (UC Davis Heffern) [3]
https://chem.libretexts.org/C…

IV. NO₂ Nitro Group: Rare "Equally Strong Doublet"

4.1 Doublet characteristics of the nitro group NO₂

The nitro group –NO₂ exhibits two strong characteristic absorption bands in the mid-infrared region, which are diagnostic "fingerprints" for the presence of a nitro group [1][6][41]:

Typical example values [1][2]:

• Nitromethane CH₃NO₂: νas = 1573 cm⁻¹, νs = 1383 cm⁻¹
• m-Nitrotoluene: νas = 1537 cm⁻¹, νs = 1358 cm⁻¹
• Nitrobenzene: νas ≈ 1520–1533 cm⁻¹, νs ≈ 1345–1350 cm⁻¹

4.2 Why does the nitro group have two peaks?

The NO₂ group contains a central nitrogen atom bonded to two oxygen atoms. On the surface, N=O and N–O differ (single vs double bond), but resonance delocalization makes the two N–O bonds completely equivalent (both are "one-and-a-half bonds") [5].

When a set of two equivalent bonds exists, two independent normal vibrational modes can arise [5]:

• Asymmetric stretching (out-of-phase): The two N–O bonds stretch oppositely (one lengthens while the other shortens), producing a higher frequency absorption at ~1550 cm⁻¹.
• Symmetric stretching (in-phase): The two N–O bonds stretch together (both lengthen or shorten simultaneously), producing a lower frequency absorption at ~1365 cm⁻¹.

"…the two N–O bonds appear non-equivalent, delocalization generates equivalent bonds. Thus, the –NO₂ group shows both symmetric and asymmetric stretching absorption peaks at ≈1550 and ≈1365 cm⁻¹, respectively."
—— JoVE Science Education [5]

Important rule: The asymmetric mode typically gives the higher frequency absorption—this rule also applies to primary amines NH₂ (doublet in the 3300–3500 cm⁻¹ region), sulfoxides SO₂, and other functional groups with equivalent bonds [5].

🔗 Detailed verification: Complete peak data for the nitro functional group can be found at ftir.fun nitro functional group page.

4.3 Aliphatic vs aromatic nitro groups (conjugation effect)

Table 9: Frequency comparison of aliphatic vs aromatic nitro groups (data from OrgChemBoulder [1], BenchChem [6])

Reason for lower frequency of aromatic nitro groups [6][7]:

• In aromatic nitro compounds, –NO₂ is conjugated with the benzene ring π system.
• The conjugation effect disperses the electron cloud density of the N–O bond toward the ring, weakening the double bond character and reducing the force constant, thus shifting the stretching vibration frequency to lower wavenumbers ("red shift").

Reverse evidence—steric hindrance deconjugation restores frequency: In 2-nitromesitylene, the steric hindrance of two ortho methyl groups twists the nitro group about 66° out of the benzene ring plane, breaking the conjugation, restoring the N=O double bond character, and νas blue-shifts to 1535–1550 cm⁻¹ (higher than the well-conjugated nitrobenzene ~1520 cm⁻¹) [8]. This is a classic example of the "steric inhibition of resonance (SIR)" effect.

4.4 Difference between nitrate ester R–ONO₂ and nitro R–NO₂

The two are easily confused but have vibrational frequency differences [7]:

Table 10: Nitro vs nitrate ester vs nitroso (data source: Peking University "University Chemistry" [7])

Key identification points [7][9]:

• νas of nitrate ester is higher than that of nitro: The asymmetric stretch of nitrate ester generally falls at 1650–1600 cm⁻¹, slightly higher than nitro compounds (typical 1550–1560 cm⁻¹).
• Experimental data for nitrate ester: In nitrocellulose (a classic nitrate ester), the NO₂ asymmetric stretch is at 1660 cm⁻¹ and the symmetric stretch at 1280 cm⁻¹ [9].

4.5 Why are NO₂ peaks particularly strong?

Why are the N–O double peaks of nitro groups so strong (often among the strongest peaks in the spectrum)? Two reasons [6][12]:

① High electronegativity of oxygen + two N=O bonds simultaneously

Oxygen has high electronegativity (3.44), and the N–O bond is highly polarized. During vibration, the two oxygen atoms move in opposite directions (asymmetric stretch), producing a large change in dipole moment (∂μ/∂r) [6].

② Quantum mechanical selection rule

According to the Beer–Lambert law and IR selection rules: the intensity of a vibrational peak is proportional to the change in dipole moment—the greater the dipole moment change, the larger the molar absorptivity ε, and the stronger the absorption peak [6][12].

"Oxygen is highly electronegative. During the N-O stretching vibration, there is a massive change in the molecular dipole moment (Δμ). According to quantum mechanical selection rules, a larger dipole moment change translates directly to a higher molar absorptivity. Consequently, nitro peaks are unusually intense and dominate the mid-IR spectrum."
—— BenchChem [6]

Since the nitro group has two strongly polar N=O bonds simultaneously, the dipole moment changes add up during asymmetric stretching, making its absorption intensity far exceed that of most other functional groups.

📷 Figure 5: IR spectrum of nitromethane, νas = 1573 cm⁻¹, νs = 1383 cm⁻¹
Source: OrgChemBoulder tutorial [1]
https://www.orgchemboulder.co…

4.6 Diagnostic value: the nitro double peak is key for identifying nitro groups

The nitro group is one of the few functional groups that simultaneously exhibit two strong absorption bands in the 1300–1600 cm⁻¹ region. Other common groups have single peaks (C=O ~1700, C=C ~1650), while the nitro group's "one large, one small, almost equal intensity" double peak (νas usually stronger than νs) is almost direct evidence for identification when interpreting spectra of unknown compounds [1][6].

Detection application for nitro-containing explosives: Beal & Brill (2005, Applied Spectroscopy) systematically studied the NO₂ vibrations of more than 50 energetic materials, confirming that asymmetric and symmetric stretching are the strongest vibrational modes of nitro groups, widely falling in the ranges 1500–1650 cm⁻¹ and 1260–1400 cm⁻¹—this feature is the physical basis for detecting explosives (TNT, RDX, PETN, etc.) by infrared and Raman spectroscopy [4].

V. C-X Halogen Bonds: The Most Intuitive Demonstration of Hooke's Law

5.1 Comprehensive Frequency Comparison Table

According to multiple authoritative sources (LibreTexts chemistry textbook, CSUN lecture notes, UCSC IR table, UCalgary textbook), the characteristic frequencies of C-X bonds are summarized as follows [1][2][3][4]:

Table 11: Characteristic frequencies of C-X bonds (data sources: LibreTexts [1], CSUN [2], UCSC [3], UCalgary [4])

5.2 Frequency decreases with increasing atomic number of halogen—a demonstration of Hooke's Law

This is the most intuitive demonstration of Hooke's Law in infrared spectroscopy [4][5][21]:

$$\bar{\nu} = \frac{1}{2\pi c}\sqrt{\frac{k}{\mu}}, \quad \mu = \frac{m_1 m_2}{m_1 + m_2}$$

where k is the force constant, and μ is the reduced mass.

Two rules [4]:

1. Stronger bond (larger k), higher frequency: C-C (1000) < C=C (1600) < C≡C (2200) cm⁻¹
2. Heavier atoms (larger μ), lower frequency: C-H (3000) > C-C (1000) > C-Cl (800) > C-Br (550) > C-I (~500) cm⁻¹

Halogen atomic weight increases: F(19) < Cl(35) < Br(80) < I(127), leading to increasing reduced mass of the C-X bond and decreasing vibrational frequency [4].

"The larger the atomic weight of the halogen, the greater the reduced mass of the C-X bond, and the lower the vibrational frequency—that is why C-F is at 1000–1400 cm⁻¹, while C-I drops to below 500 cm⁻¹."
—— UCalgary Dr. Ian Hunt textbook [4]

📷 Figure 6: Overlaid spectra of PTFE, CH₂Cl₂, CH₂Br₂, and CH₂I₂, clearly showing the decreasing frequency trend C-F → C-Cl → C-Br → C-I
Source: Spectroscopy magazine (Brian C. Smith, 2023) [5]
https://spectroscopyonline.co…

5.3 Detailed explanation of C-F bonds

Distinction between monofluoro and polyfluoro

BenchChem technical guide [6] explicitly gives the detailed ranges for C-F bonds:

| 三氟甲基（-CF₃） | 1100–1350 | 常以"双峰"形式出现（对称与不对称伸缩） |
| 芳基-F（Aryl-F） | 1200–1270 | 与芳环共轭，频率上移 |

表 12：C-F 键的细分频率（数据来源：BenchChem [6]）

C-F 在红外中常见但难归属的原因

强度极高的物理机制 [6]：氟是电负性最强的元素（鲍林标度 3.98），C-F 键高度极化。红外吸收强度与振动过程中偶极矩变化的平方成正比。C-F 伸缩振动诱导巨大的偶极矩变化，因此产生极强的吸收峰，常"淹没"指纹区中较弱的信号。

归属困难的原因 [6]：

• C-F 区（1000–1400 cm⁻¹）与以下振动严重重叠：
  • C-O 伸缩（醇、醚、酯）：1050–1250 cm⁻¹
  • C-N 伸缩：约 1000–1350 cm⁻¹
• 区分策略：C-F 峰通常比 C-O 伸缩更宽、更强；在高度氟化的分子中，C-F 带会"淹没"整个谱图。

🔗 深入查证：C-F 键的官能团数据，见 ftir.fun 氟官能团页。

C-F 在氟化聚合物分析中的核心地位

PTFE（聚四氟乙烯，特氟龙）

PerkinElmer FTIR 博客 [12] 详细记录了 PTFE 的 ATR 谱图归属：

表 13：PTFE 的主要 IR 吸收归属（数据来源：PerkinElmer FTIR 博客 [12]）

PTFE 谱图极为简洁，因为重复单元中只含 C-F 和 C-C 键，不含 C-H、C-O、C=O、C-N 等官能团，1200–1100 cm⁻¹ 区域的两条强 C-F 伸缩峰是其"指纹"特征 [12][13]。

PVDF（聚偏氟乙烯）的多晶型分析

PVDF 具有 α、β、γ 三种晶型，其中只有 β 相具有压电性，因此红外谱图相态归属在材料研究中至关重要。ACS Omega（Kmetík 等, 2024）[16] 给出 PVDF 各相的特征带：

• α 相：975、797 cm⁻¹
• β 相：1279、881 cm⁻¹（以及 840 cm⁻¹ 附近的 CH₂ rocking）
• β/γ 共有：1234 cm⁻¹ 附近

5.4 C-Cl、C-Br、C-I 与远红外扩展

C-Cl 伸缩

• 频率范围：550–800 cm⁻¹（典型 600–800 cm⁻¹）[1][2][3]
• 强度：强 [2]
• 处于指纹区，常与芳环面外弯曲振动（700–900 cm⁻¹）重叠。

C-Br 伸缩

• 频率范围：500–700 cm⁻¹（典型 515–690 cm⁻¹）[1][2]
• 强度：中至强

BenchChem [20] 详细分析了 C-Br 键检测的挑战：

• 脂肪族 C-Br 伸缩目标频率约 600–700 cm⁻¹
• 干扰源：对位取代酚的 Ar-H 面外弯曲在 800–850 cm⁻¹，芳环变形在 600–700 cm⁻¹
• ATR-FTIR 用 ZnSe 晶体（截止约 600 cm⁻¹）可能完全漏检 C-Br 基频；KBr 压片透射法（截止约 400 cm⁻¹）是"金标准"；Raman 是最佳正交验证手段（C-Br 极化率高，拉曼信号强）。

C-I 伸缩

• 频率范围：约 500 cm⁻¹ 以下（< 600 cm⁻¹）[1][2][3]
• 强度：中至强
• 通常落在常规红外（4000–400 cm⁻¹）的边界或之外。

为什么 C-Cl、C-Br、C-I 常处于常规红外边界或之外？

仪器限制 [21][23]：

• 常规中红外仪器测量范围为 4000–400 cm⁻¹。
• NaCl 窗片透光至 650 cm⁻¹；KCl 至 500 cm⁻¹；KBr 至 400 cm⁻¹。
• C-Br（~500–600）、C-I（~500 以下）常接近或超出 KBr 窗片截止限，需用 CsI 或聚乙烯窗片才能进入远红外区。
• ATR 晶体选择影响巨大：ZnSe 截止 ~600 cm⁻¹（漏检 C-Br）；金刚石/Ge 截止 ~200–525 cm⁻¹ [20]。

远红外区（< 400 cm⁻¹）的扩展应用

巴格达大学 Dr. Nagham 讲义 [23] 将红外区分为三段：

• 近红外（12820–4000 cm⁻¹）：倍频与合频，定量分析
• 中红外（4000–400 cm⁻¹）：有机分子结构信息
• 远红外（400–33 cm⁻¹）：含重原子分子的振动、分子骨架振动、晶格振动

远红外区在以下场景中具有扩展应用价值 [23]：

• 检测 C-Br、C-I 等重原子-碳键的伸缩振动
• 无机分子（金属-配体振动）分析
• 晶格振动（声子谱）研究
• 分子骨架整体振动模式

六、特征频率汇总速查表

综合 Ep 05 与 Ep 06 的内容，下面是常见官能团的特征频率速查表（建议收藏）：

| Aliphatic ether C-O-C | Antisymmetric stretching | ~1120 | Strong | Single main peak |
| Ester C-O | Antisymmetric/symmetric stretching | ~1240 / ~1100 | Strong, doublet | Accompanied by C=O |
| Primary alcohol C-O | Stretching | ~1050 | Strong | Accompanied by broad O-H |
| Secondary alcohol C-O | Stretching | ~1100 | Strong | |
| Tertiary alcohol C-O | Stretching | ~1150 | Strong | |
| Phenol C-O | Stretching | ~1230 | Strong | Shifted upward due to conjugation |
| C-F | Stretching | 1000–1400 | Strong | Doublet for polyfluoro |
| C-Cl | Stretching | 550–800 | Strong | Fingerprint region |
| C-Br | Stretching | 500–700 | Medium to strong | Near IR boundary |
| C-I | Stretching | Below ~500 | Medium to strong | Far IR region |

Table 14: Quick reference table of characteristic frequencies of common functional groups (combining this episode and the previous one)

Summary of This Episode

Review Questions

1. A compound shows a sharp peak at ~3300 cm⁻¹. What functional groups could it be? How to distinguish further?
2. An unknown spectrum has no absorption in the 2100–2260 cm⁻¹ region. Can it be confirmed that it contains no triple bonds? Why?
3. Explain why the C≡C stretching vibration of symmetric internal alkyne R–C≡C–R "disappears" in IR spectroscopy.
4. Why is the antisymmetric stretching frequency of aromatic nitro (~1530 cm⁻¹) lower than that of aliphatic nitro (~1580 cm⁻¹)?
5. How to distinguish ether, alcohol, and ester oxygen-containing compounds using only IR spectroscopy?
6. The absorption peaks of C-F bond are in the range 1000–1400 cm⁻¹, overlapping with C-O stretching. How to distinguish them in practice?
7. Why is the C-I stretching vibration often "invisible" in conventional IR spectroscopy (4000–400 cm⁻¹)?
8. An unknown compound shows absorption peaks at 2720 cm⁻¹ and 1720 cm⁻¹. Please infer which functional group(s) may be present.

References

C-H Stretching Vibration Section

[1] LibreTexts. "12.8: Infrared Spectra of Some Common Functional Groups." McMurry Organic Chemistry.
https://chem.libretexts.org/@…

[2] LibreTexts. "14.5: Infrared Spectra of Some Common Functional Groups."
https://chem.libretexts.org/@…

[3] Maricopa Community College. "Ch. 6.3: IR Spectrum and Characteristic Absorption Bands." Fundamentals of Organic Chemistry.
https://open.maricopa.edu/fun…

[4] LibreTexts. "5.2: IR-Spectroscopy: The Workhorse." PSU Organic Chemistry Lab Manual.
https://chem.libretexts.org/@…

[5] Das, A. "Chapter 17: Infrared Spectroscopy (Vibrational Modes)." WikiEducator, CC BY-SA 3.0.
https://arijitchemistryworld.…

[6] OpenStax. "12.7: Interpreting Infrared Spectra." Organic Chemistry.
https://openstax.org/books/or…

[7] ReadChemistry. "Hydrocarbons: Infrared Spectroscopy of Hydrocarbons." Wade Organic Chemistry.
https://readchemistry.com/202…

[8] Fiveable. "Infrared Spectroscopy Functional Groups."
https://fiveable.me/lists/inf…

[9] OrgChemBoulder (University of Colorado Boulder). "IR Spectroscopy Tutorial: Alkynes."
https://www.orgchemboulder.co…

[10] Chadwick, D. J.; Chambers, J.; Meakins, G. D.; Snowden, R. L. "The infrared bands of thiophen-2-carbaldehydes in the carbonyl region: multiple absorption caused by Fermi resonance." J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1975, 604-607.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/conte…

[11] Brito, A. L. B.; Roque, J. P. L.; Sıdır, İ.; Fausto, R. "Low-Temperature Infrared Spectra and Ultraviolet-Induced Rotamerization of 5-Chlorosalicylaldehyde." J. Phys. Chem. A, 2022, 126(31), 5148-5159.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1…

[12] Guo, Yanchun et al. "Discussion on the Influence of Ring Strain on the Infrared Absorption Frequencies of C=C and C=O Double Bonds." University Chemistry, 2023, 38(8):305-311.
https://www.dxhx.pku.edu.cn/a…

[13] Technical University of Munich. "Interpretation and Assignment of IR and Raman Spectra." Organic Chemistry Lecture Notes, Chapter 5.
https://academics.nat.tum.de/…

[14] Pearson. "Hybridization: C-H bond length in ethane vs. ethene." Organic Chemistry.
https://www.pearson.com/chann…

[15] Pearson. "Would you expect an acetylenic C-H to absorb at a higher or lower wavenumber than the C-H in ethene?" Mullins 1st Ed., Ch. 14.
https://www.pearson.com/chann…

[16] Cao, Zhaotun. "Influence of Carbon Atom Valence Orbital Electronegativity on Chemical Bond Properties." University Chemistry, 2017, 32(7):77-82.
https://www.dxhx.pku.edu.cn/a…

Triple Bond Region Section

[20] Vanderbilt University. "Chapter 13: Spectroscopy."
https://cdn.vanderbilt.edu/vu…

[21] BenchChem. "A Practical Guide to Differentiating Terminal and Internal Alkynes using IR Spectroscopy."
https://pdf.benchchem.com/158…

[22] Smith, B. C. "Organic Nitrogen Compounds IV: Nitriles." Spectroscopy, Vol. 34, Issue 7, July 2019.
https://www.spectroscopyonlin…

[23] NIST Chemistry WebBook. "Acetonitrile (CAS 75-05-8) IR Spectrum."
https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/…

[24] LibreTexts (Smith College). "11.9: Spectroscopy of Carboxylic Acids and Nitriles."
https://chem.libretexts.org/C…

[25] Arizona State University. "CHM 233 Organic Structure Determination 1 – IR Spectroscopy notes."
https://www.asu.edu/courses/c…

C-O-C Ether and C-O Alcohol/Ester Section

[31] LibreTexts. "18.9: Spectroscopy of Ethers." McMurry Organic Chemistry.
https://chem.libretexts.org/@…

[2] BenchChem. "An In-depth Technical Guide to the Infrared (IR) Spectroscopy of Ether Linkages." April 2026.
https://pdf.benchchem.com/103…

[3] LibreTexts (UC Davis, Heffern). "4.7: Identifying Characteristic Functional Groups."

https://chem.libretexts.org/C…

[7] BenchChem. "A Researcher's Guide to Identifying Naphthyl Ether Functional Groups Using FTIR Spectroscopy." May 2026.
https://pdf.benchchem.com/166…

[8] Smith, B. C. "The Infrared Spectra of Polymers V: Epoxies." Spectroscopy, 37(3), 17–19, March 2022. DOI: 10.56530/spectroscopy.mg2473z4.
https://www.spectroscopyonlin…

[9] Nikolic, G. et al. "Fast Fourier Transform IR Characterization of Epoxy GY Systems Crosslinked with Aliphatic and Cycloaliphatic EH Polyamine Adducts." Sensors, 10(1), 684–696, 2010. DOI: 10.3390/s100100684.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/…

[10] LibreTexts. "3.1.12: Spectroscopy of Alcohols and Phenols."
https://chem.libretexts.org/@…

[11] LibreTexts (Shasta College, McMurry). "6.12: Spectroscopy of Alcohols and Phenols."
https://chem.libretexts.org/C…

[12] LibreTexts. "12.8: Infrared Spectra of Some Common Functional Groups." McMurry.
https://batch.libretexts.org/…

[13] Mandal, K. K. "Infrared Spectroscopy (Part-4, PPT-10)." St. Paul's C. M. College, Kolkata.
https://www.spcmc.ac.in/uploa…

[15] organica1.org. "11 Análisis espectroscópico de alcoholes."
http://www.organica1.org/qo1/…

[16] CSDN. "红外光谱中特征官能团的振动频率."
https://blog.csdn.net/allenkx…

[17] rt-students.com. "IR Spectrum Of An Ester."
https://rt-students.com/ir-sp…

[19] Pearson. "Bruice 8th Ed., Ch. 13 Problem 24: Why is the C–O absorption band of 1-hexanol at a smaller wavenumber (1060 cm–1) than that of pentanoic acid (1220 cm–1)?"
https://www.pearson.com/chann…

NO₂ Nitro Groups

[1] OrgChemBoulder (University of Colorado Boulder). "IR Spectroscopy Tutorial: Nitro Groups."
https://www.orgchemboulder.co…

[2] NIST Chemistry WebBook. "Nitrobenzene (CAS 98-95-3) IR Spectrum."
https://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/…

[3] Shlyapochnikov, V. A. et al. "The structure of nitrobenzene and the interpretation of the vibrational frequencies of the C-NO₂ moiety on the basis of ab initio calculations." J. Mol. Struct., 1994, 326:1-16.
https://www.sci-hub.st/storag…

[4] Beal, R. W.; Brill, T. B. "Vibrational Behavior of the −NO₂ Group in Energetic Compounds." Applied Spectroscopy, 2005, 59(10):1194-1202. DOI:10.1366/000370205774430873.

SOURCE: https://www.researchgate.net/…

[5] JoVE Science Education. "IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations."
https://www.jove.com/science-…

[6] BenchChem. "An In-depth Technical Guide to the Infrared Spectroscopy of Substituted Nitrobenzenes."
https://pdf.benchchem.com/126…

[7] Wang Jingzun, Wang Ting. "How to Interpret Infrared Spectra." University Chemistry, 2016, 31(6): 90-97. DOI:10.3866/PKU.DXHX201504001.
https://www.dxhx.pku.edu.cn/a…

[8] BenchChem. "Spectroscopic Profiling of Sterically Hindered Nitro-Aromatics: A Comparative Guide to FT-IR Analysis of 2-Nitromesitylene."
https://pdf.benchchem.com/158…

[9] Cazacu, A. et al. "Physical-Mechanical Properties of Nitrodopes Affected by Ultra-Violet Radiation." Sensors, 2007, 7(7):2139-2154.
https://openi.nlm.nih.gov/det…

[12] Trivedi, M. K. et al. "Impact of Biofield Treatment on Spectroscopic and Physicochemical Properties of p-Nitroaniline." 2015.
https://www.researchgate.net/…

C-X Halogen Bond Section

[1] LibreTexts (Morsch et al.). "5.9: Infrared Spectra of Some Common Functional Groups." Organic Chemistry.
https://chem.libretexts.org/@…

[2] California State University, Northridge (CSUN). "Selected Infrared Correlations."
https://www.csun.edu/~hcchm00…

[3] University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC). "IR Tables."
https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com…

[4] University of Calgary (Dr. Ian Hunt). "Chapter 13: Spectroscopy."
https://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/…

[5] Smith, B. C. "Halogenated Organic Compounds." Spectroscopy, Vol. 38, Issue 9, September 2023, pp. 12–15, 42. DOI: 10.56530/spectroscopy.vo3774k1.
https://spectroscopyonline.co…

[6] BenchChem. "Comparative Guide: Characterization of C-F and C-S Bonds via Infrared (IR) Spectroscopy."
https://pdf.benchchem.com/272…

[10] Abbate, S. et al. "CF₃: an overlooked chromophore in VCD spectra." RSC Adv., 2019, 9, 11781–11796. DOI: 10.1039/C9RA01358J.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/conte…

[11] HandWiki. "Chemistry: Carbon–fluorine bond."
https://handwiki.org/wiki/Che…

[12] PerkinElmer FTIR Blog. "Issue 37: Analysis of Foreign Substance Spectra ⑭ Fluororesin."
https://www.perkinelmer.co.jp…

[13] Rajabinejad, H. et al. "Impact of sintering temperature and compression load on the crystallinity and structural ordering of polytetrafluoroethylene." RSC Adv., 2025, 15, 32746–32757. DOI: 10.1039/d5ra03395k.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/conte…

[16] Kmetík, M. et al. "Characterization of Modified PVDF Membranes Using Fourier Transform Infrared and Raman Microscopy and Infrared Nanoimaging." ACS Omega, 2024, 9(23), 24685–24694. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c01197.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1…

[20] BenchChem. "Technical Guide: IR Spectrum Analysis of C-Br Bonds in Bromomethyl Phenols."
https://pdf.benchchem.com/335…

[21] Surendranath College (Dr. Harisadhan Ghosh). "IR Spectroscopy Lecture Notes."
http://www.surendranathcolleg…

[23] University of Baghdad (Dr. Nagham). "IR and FTIR principle and instruments."
https://sc.uobaghdad.edu.iq/w…

Database Resources

[SDBS] AIST, Japan. "Spectral Database for Organic Compounds (SDBS)."
https://sdbs.db.aist.go.jp/sd…

[NIST] NIST Chemistry WebBook.
https://webbook.nist.gov/chem…

[ftir.fun] ftir.fun Infrared Spectral Database.
https://ftir.fun

Preview of Next Episode: Ep 07 — Fingerprint Region – The "ID Card" of Molecules
We will delve into the fingerprint region from 400–1500 cm⁻¹. Although difficult to assign peak by peak, it is highly specific—it is the core basis for substance identification. We will discuss how out-of-plane bending of aromatic rings (700–900 cm⁻¹) determines substitution patterns, how in-plane CH₂ rocking (~720 cm⁻¹) indicates chain length, and how to distinguish ortho/meta/para-substituted benzenes via the fingerprint region.

This article is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Images are from public domain or web sources with credited originals; copyrights belong to the original authors.