View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
The spectrum is dominated by strong silica/siloxane absorptions (Si-O bending at 465 cm⁻¹, Si-O-Si stretching at 1073 and 1099 cm⁻¹, and intertetrahedral Si-O-Si bending at 797 cm⁻¹), indicating a major silicate or silicon dioxide component. The presence of a broad O-H stretch at 3485 cm⁻¹ and a water bending mode at 1645 cm⁻¹ suggests adsorbed moisture or silanol groups. Additionally, weak to moderate bands at 410–493 cm⁻¹ and around 564–600 cm⁻¹ are attributable to metal-oxygen vibrations, compatible with zinc oxide. Bands at 600, 1099, 1117, 1134, 1159, and 1192 cm⁻¹ can be assigned to sulfate S-O stretching and bending modes, consistent with the library-retrieved top candidate zinc sulfate. A peak at 967 cm⁻¹ may arise from SiO₄ tetrahedra or silanol Si-OH vibrations. The overall chemical evidence suggests a silica-dominant material that incorporates zinc and sulfate species; however, the library match confidence is low, and the exact proportions and phases remain uncertain FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.
Recommended next steps: Acquire reference spectra of pure zinc sulfate and zinc oxide in mixtures with silica for direct library comparison. Perform complementary techniques such as XRF or XRD to clarify elemental composition and phase identity. If possible, conduct thermal gravimetric analysis to assess volatile content (water/organics).
| Rank | Match % | Compound | SMILES | Spectrum No. | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading library candidates... | |||||
| # | Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) | Absorbance | Assignment | Citation | Assignment status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | · | 465 | 0.91 | - | - | - |
| 2 | · | 425 | 0.90 | - | - | - |
| 3 | · | 452 | 0.66 | - | - | - |
| 4 | · | 1099 | 0.56 | - | - | - |
| 5 | · | 1073 | 0.42 | - | - | - |
| 6 | · | 1117 | 0.39 | - | - | - |
| 7 | · | 1159 | 0.36 | - | - | - |
| 8 | · | 1134 | 0.33 | - | - | - |
| 9 | · | 1192 | 0.30 | - | - | - |
| 10 | · | 493 | 0.29 | - | - | - |
| 11 | · | 410 | 0.24 | - | - | - |
| 12 | · | 3485 | 0.23 | - | - | - |
| 13 | · | 967 | 0.13 | - | - | - |
| 14 | · | 480 | 0.13 | - | - | - |
| 15 | · | 511 | 0.12 | - | - | - |
| 16 | · | 1645 | 0.11 | - | - | - |
| 17 | · | 437 | 0.10 | - | - | - |
| 18 | · | 797 | 0.09 | - | - | - |
| 19 | · | 564 | 0.05 | - | - | - |
| 20 | · | 600 | 0.05 | - | - | - |
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.
FTIR.fun