What absorbs at 1862 cm⁻¹ in an FTIR spectrum?
A band near 1862 cm⁻¹ can point to several functional groups. Below are the most likely assignments, ranked by how much published evidence supports each — every one traceable to literature (DOI) and cross-validated against our 130,000+ reference spectra and knowledge graph.
Backed by 2 cited sources
Quick answer
A band near 1862 cm⁻¹ is usually interpreted by checking which functional groups repeatedly co-occur there in the literature, then confirming at least one or two additional peaks in the same sample. This page ranks those assignments by accumulated evidence rather than by a single fixed textbook rule.
Possíveis atribuições de grupos funcionais
| Grupo funcional | Fatos de suporte | Fontes citadas | Maior confiança |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methoxy (OCH3) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Methacrylate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| C-O single bond | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Acetate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Adsorbed carbon monoxide | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Metal oxygen | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
A classificação reflete a evidência acumulada da literatura, não uma única regra autoritária. Sempre confirme com o contexto da sua amostra.
Possible materials
| Material | Picos de suporte | Overlapping groups | Fontes citadas |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2 | 1862, 1700, 1093 | Methacrylate, Acetate, C-O single bond | 1 |
Materials are shown only when the same literature pool supports this band and at least one additional characteristic peak.
Spectrum logic
This band becomes meaningful only when read with its neighboring peaks. In practice, analysts first look at the assignments above, then check whether the same sample also shows other peaks expected for the same structural motif. A lone band near 1862 cm⁻¹ is usually not enough for material identification by itself.
Real-world usage
This type of query is common in polymer identification, unknown plastic screening, QC troubleshooting, recycled-material verification, and literature-backed peak assignment review.
Common mistakes
- Treating one isolated band as proof of a material without checking at least one or two supporting peaks.
- Ignoring overlap: multiple functional groups can contribute near the same wavenumber.
- Skipping validation when additives, blends, oxidation, or contamination may distort the spectrum.
Verification advice
When ambiguity remains, validate the hypothesis with DSC, GC-MS, or TGA, especially for blends, degraded samples, and filled polymers.
Literatura por trás destas atribuições
-
confiança 1,0
“distinguished also on the spectra of 1% Au/TiO 2 1% Rh/TiO was 30% [12] and that of 5% Rh/TiO was Bands due to adsorbed CO species (2149, 2030, 1910 and 2 2 1862cm-1) 27%.”
Kecskes 等 - 2004 - FTIR and mass spectrometric study of HCOOH interac DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2004.03.021 -
Acetate confiança 1,0
“At the same time, the peak cm-1 cm-1 at 1078 (C-O bond, brown line) and 1862 (C=O bond) began to increase, indicating the at 1078 cm-1 (C-O bond, brown line) and 1862 cm-1 (C=O bond) began to increase, indicating the”
A Novel Synthesis of 4-Acetoxyl 5(4H)-Oxazolones by Direct -Oxidation of N-Benzoyl Amino-Acid Using Hypervalent Iodine DOI: 10.3390/molecules22071102
Tem um espectro com esta banda?
Carregue seu espectro FTIR e obtenha um relatório de interpretação completo — atribuições de picos com citações da literatura, correspondências de biblioteca e uma cadeia de evidências com nível de confiança — em segundos.