What absorbs at 1860 cm⁻¹ in an FTIR spectrum?
A band near 1860 cm⁻¹ can point to several functional groups. Below are the most likely assignments, ranked by how much published evidence supports each — every one traceable to literature (DOI) and cross-validated against our 130,000+ reference spectra and knowledge graph.
Backed by 3 cited sources
Quick answer
A band near 1860 cm⁻¹ is usually interpreted by checking which functional groups repeatedly co-occur there in the literature, then confirming at least one or two additional peaks in the same sample. This page ranks those assignments by accumulated evidence rather than by a single fixed textbook rule.
Possíveis atribuições de grupos funcionais
| Grupo funcional | Fatos de suporte | Fontes citadas | Maior confiança |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbonyl (C=O) | 2 | 2 | 1,0 |
| Methacrylate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ketone | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Ester | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Carboxyl (COOH) | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Amide | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| Acetate | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
| N-O bond | 1 | 1 | 1,0 |
A classificação reflete a evidência acumulada da literatura, não uma única regra autoritária. Sempre confirme com o contexto da sua amostra.
Possible materials
| Material | Picos de suporte | Overlapping groups | Fontes citadas |
|---|---|---|---|
| epoxy | 1860, 1660, 1735 | Methacrylate, Carbonyl (C=O) | 1 |
| polyimide | 1860, 1720, 1778 | Carbonyl (C=O), Methacrylate | 1 |
Materials are shown only when the same literature pool supports this band and at least one additional characteristic peak.
Spectrum logic
This band becomes meaningful only when read with its neighboring peaks. In practice, analysts first look at the assignments above, then check whether the same sample also shows other peaks expected for the same structural motif. A lone band near 1860 cm⁻¹ is usually not enough for material identification by itself.
Real-world usage
This type of query is common in polymer identification, unknown plastic screening, QC troubleshooting, recycled-material verification, and literature-backed peak assignment review.
Common mistakes
- Treating one isolated band as proof of a material without checking at least one or two supporting peaks.
- Ignoring overlap: multiple functional groups can contribute near the same wavenumber.
- Skipping validation when additives, blends, oxidation, or contamination may distort the spectrum.
Verification advice
When ambiguity remains, validate the hypothesis with DSC, GC-MS, or TGA, especially for blends, degraded samples, and filled polymers.
Literatura por trás destas atribuições
-
N-O bond confiança 1,0
“6c) were observed at 1860 cm-1, cm-1 frequencies upshifted by 2 and 4 Examination of the pH dependence of the NO bands, and 1853 from the untreated ones, with a higher relative intensity however, did not provide a straightforward result: th”
Suzuki 等 - 2004 - Thermal equilibrium of two conformations in photos DOI: 10.1093/jb/mvh096 -
Acetate confiança 1,0
“cm-1, Firstly, the absorption peak at 1860 which is characteristic of the C=O group in Firstly, the absorption peak at 1860 cm-1, which is characteristic of the C=O group in carboxylic dianhydride in PMDA, is absent in the PI spectra.”
Interpenetration Networked Polyimide–Epoxy Copolymer under Kinetic and Thermodynamic Control for Anticorrosion Coating DOI: 10.3390/polym15010243 -
Carbonyl (C=O) confiança 1,0
“Comparing the ABS spectrum with the purified samples, it is possible to detect the appearance of three new absorbance peaks that are related to it is possible to detect the appearance of three new absorbance peaks that are related to the su”
Enhancing the Interface Behavior on Polycarbonate/Elastomeric Blends: Morphological, Structural, and Thermal Characterization DOI: 10.3390/polym15071773
Tem um espectro com esta banda?
Carregue seu espectro FTIR e obtenha um relatório de interpretação completo — atribuições de picos com citações da literatura, correspondências de biblioteca e uma cadeia de evidências com nível de confiança — em segundos.