FTIR MATERIAL QUESTION

How can you identify serum from FTIR?

This page summarizes the recurring FTIR evidence reported for serum, including the most frequent peaks, supporting functional groups, and literature-backed interpretation patterns. It is a structured evidence page, not a claim of automatic single-spectrum certainty.

Backed by 11 cited sources

Quick answer

serum is usually reported with a recurring pattern of peaks and functional-group evidence. The most useful approach is to cross-check at least two characteristic peaks before treating it as a match, then verify whether the full spectrum still fits the same material family.

Peak interpretation

Pīķis (cm⁻¹) Evidence count
1656 10
1122 7
1412 5
1034 4
1500 2
984 2
1642 2
1652 2

Possible materials / groups

Funkcionālā grupa Pierādījumi
Amide 7
Phosphate (PO4) 4
Protein 3
Ester 3
Methyl 3
Methoxy (OCH3) 3
Methacrylate 3
Alkyl C-H 3

Spectrum logic

The logic here is evidence aggregation: repeated literature mentions of serum, repeated peak positions, and repeated functional-group associations. A strong material hypothesis should still be supported by multiple peaks that agree with each other, not by one headline band alone.

Real-world usage

This page is designed for polymer identification, incoming-material QC, unknown plastic analysis, recycled-content review, and literature-backed interpretation of reference spectra.

Common mistakes

  • Calling a material match too early because one famous peak is present.
  • Ignoring sample prep, fillers, oxidation, water, or additives that can change the apparent pattern.
  • Using literature evidence without checking whether your own sampling mode and spectrum quality are comparable.

Verification advice

Use DSC, GC-MS, or TGA to validate the material hypothesis when the peak pattern is ambiguous or mixed.

Literature behind this page

Upload your FTIR spectrum

Get AI-based polymer identification and peak-by-peak interpretation from your own spectrum.

Iesniegt pieprasījumu Veidlapa