FTIR MATERIAL QUESTION

How can you identify PEG from FTIR?

This page summarizes the recurring FTIR evidence reported for PEG, including the most frequent peaks, supporting functional groups, and literature-backed interpretation patterns. It is a structured evidence page, not a claim of automatic single-spectrum certainty.

Backed by 32 cited sources

Quick answer

PEG is usually reported with a recurring pattern of peaks and functional-group evidence. The most useful approach is to cross-check at least two characteristic peaks before treating it as a match, then verify whether the full spectrum still fits the same material family.

Peak interpretation

Pico (cm⁻¹) Evidence count
1650 11
1342 11
1100 10
1600 9
1542 8
1717 8
1720 7
1098 7

Possible materials / groups

Grupo funcional Evidência
Alkyl C-H 49
Hydroxyl (O-H) 34
Methacrylate 31
Acetate 31
C-O single bond 29
Methoxy (OCH3) 27
Carbonyl (C=O) 17
Ester 12

Spectrum logic

The logic here is evidence aggregation: repeated literature mentions of PEG, repeated peak positions, and repeated functional-group associations. A strong material hypothesis should still be supported by multiple peaks that agree with each other, not by one headline band alone.

Real-world usage

This page is designed for polymer identification, incoming-material QC, unknown plastic analysis, recycled-content review, and literature-backed interpretation of reference spectra.

Common mistakes

  • Calling a material match too early because one famous peak is present.
  • Ignoring sample prep, fillers, oxidation, water, or additives that can change the apparent pattern.
  • Using literature evidence without checking whether your own sampling mode and spectrum quality are comparable.

Verification advice

Use DSC, GC-MS, or TGA to validate the material hypothesis when the peak pattern is ambiguous or mixed.

Literature behind this page

Upload your FTIR spectrum

Get AI-based polymer identification and peak-by-peak interpretation from your own spectrum.

Enviar Pedido Formulário