RESULT PAGE

Saturated polyester or closely related aliphatic ester polymer

View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.

Result No.: 20251023091248240473927 Owner: publicuser Comments: 0
FTIR Analysis Report Low confidence

Saturated polyester or closely related aliphatic ester polymer

Sample & Measurement Parameters

Report No. 20251023091248240473927
Date
Spectral Range (cm⁻¹) N/A
Baseline AsLS baseline correction
Library match 29%

Identification Result

29%

The infrared spectrum is typical of a saturated polyester or a similar ester‑based material. A strong carbonyl band at 1732 cm⁻¹, aliphatic C–H stretching at 2934 and 2873 cm⁻¹, prominent C–O bands in the 1082–1140 cm⁻¹ region, and a broad O–H feature near 3536 cm⁻¹ collectively point to an ester backbone with aliphatic chains and some hydroxyl character FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.

Detailed interpretation

  • Top library match: SATURATED POLYESTER #67293
  • Several literature‑extracted peak assignments are not expected for a saturated polyester: the 755 cm⁻¹ band has been attributed to metal–oxygen [3] and the 1176 cm⁻¹ band to fluorine [2].
  • An independent correlation report notes that the 1082 and 3536 cm⁻¹ features could also arise from Si–O and structural O-H in smectite minerals; this alternative does not align with the organic library direction.
  • The library similarity is low (15%), S-O a definitive identification of the exact polyester or ester formulation cannot be made from FTIR alone.
  • Bands at 755 cm⁻¹ and 1176 cm⁻¹ remain ambiguous and may indicate trace contaminants, minor C-O‑components, or incorrect literature assignments.
  • Broad O–H absorption and the potential mineral contribution introduce additional uncertainty regarding sample purity and the precise chemical structure.

Recommended next steps: Compare the spectrum with authentic saturated polyester references (e.g., poly(ethylene adipate), poly(propylene succinate)) to improve matching confidence. Use complementary techniques such as DSC/TGA, NMR, or mass spectrometry to confirm the polymer identity and rule out inorganic contaminants. If inorganic components are suspected, perform an ash test and re‑examine the residue by FTIR or X‑ray diffraction.

Library Comparison

Library spectrum will appear here.

Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates

Rank Match % Compound SMILES Spectrum No. Action
Loading library candidates...

Peak Analysis

★ = Literature-supported assignment
# Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) Absorbance Assignment Citation Assignment status
1 · 1732 1.00 - - -
2 · 1176 0.79 - - -
3 · 1140 0.76 - - -
4 · 1082 0.61 - - -
5 · 1378 0.56 - - -
6 · 2934 0.55 - - -
7 · 1461 0.48 - - -
8 · 1418 0.42 - - -
9 · 988 0.37 - - -
10 · 2873 0.35 - - -
11 · 755 0.30 - - -
12 · 3536 0.12 - - -

Appendix — Raw Spectrum

Raw sample spectrum
Generated by FTIR.fun — Report #20251023091248240473927
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

Submit Requirement Form