RESULT PAGE

Aliphatic-aromatic polyamide / amide-containing polymer with possible methacrylate/acrylate character

View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.

Result No.: 20250913210157530392244 Owner: publicuser Comments: 0
FTIR Analysis Report Low confidence

Aliphatic-aromatic polyamide / amide-containing polymer with possible methacrylate/acrylate character

Sample & Measurement Parameters

Report No. 20250913210157530392244
Date
Spectral Range (cm⁻¹) N/A
Baseline AsLS baseline correction
Library match 36%

Identification Result

36%

The sample exhibits a pattern characteristic of a secondary amide (polyamide) material, with strong amide I (1633 cm⁻¹), amide II (1536 cm⁻¹), and N–H stretch (3292 cm⁻¹) accompanied by prominent aliphatic C–H stretches (2928, 2855 cm⁻¹) and bands consistent with amide III/CH₂ rocking (1261 cm⁻¹) and C–N/C–O vibrations (1120–1198 cm⁻¹). The reference library comparison suggests an aliphatic amide (N-hexylhexanediamide) as the top candidate, while a broader library consensus and spectral features point to aromatic contributions and possible methacrylate/acrylate residues, though no pronounced ester carbonyl is observed. The overall classification is an aromatic–aliphatic amide-rich polymer, but the low search similarity (15%) precludes a precise entity assignment FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.

Detailed interpretation

  • Top library match: N-hexylhexanediamide #76695
  • Direct literature evidence tentatively links 682 cm⁻¹ to ‘halo’ [5] and 956 cm⁻¹ to ‘metal‑oxo’ [4]; these assignments come from wholly different material systems (polysaccharides, vanadium oxide nanofibers) and do not fit the polyamide hypothesis, but they highlight that these peaks could have alternative origins if the material is a composite or contaminated.
  • The library confidence is low (15 %) and the top hit (N‑hexylhexanediamide) is only one possible aliphatic amide; the exact chain length, aromatic substitution, or presence of minor methacrylate/acrylate C-O‑monomers cannot be determined from IR alone.
  • Several candidates in the library’s top‑15 list contain methacrylate or acetate motifs, introducing the possibility of a copolymer or a mixed sample, but the current spectral evidence does not support a major ester component.

Recommended next steps: Compare the spectrum with reference data for known polyamides (e.g., Nylon 6, Nylon 6/6, N‑hexylhexanediamide) and with aromatic polyamide resins to narrow the structural type. Use complementary techniques such as ¹H/¹³C NMR, mass spectrometry (Py‑GC/MS or MALDI‑ToF), and elemental analysis to confirm the backbone composition and the presence of aromatic rings or additional functional groups. Perform a solvent extraction or pyrolysis to isolate components if a blend is suspected, and acquire reference spectra of the individual candidates for rigorous library search.

Library Comparison

Library spectrum will appear here.

Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates

Rank Match % Compound SMILES Spectrum No. Action
Loading library candidates...

Peak Analysis

★ = Literature-supported assignment
# Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) Absorbance Assignment Citation Assignment status
1 · 1633 1.00 - - -
2 · 1536 0.85 - - -
3 · 682 0.53 - - -
4 · 1261 0.40 - - -
5 · 1460 0.39 - - -
6 · 3292 0.39 - - -
7 · 1198 0.35 - - -
8 · 1415 0.35 - - -
9 · 2928 0.31 - - -
10 · 1370 0.31 - - -
11 · 1168 0.30 - - -
12 · 2855 0.25 - - -
13 · 1120 0.20 - - -
14 · 956 0.19 - - -
15 · 2360 0.18 - - -

Appendix — Raw Spectrum

Raw sample spectrum
Generated by FTIR.fun — Report #20250913210157530392244
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

Submit Requirement Form