RESULT PAGE

Unsaturated ester / vinyl acetate type polymer with methyl/methoxy groups and possible aromatic components; low library confidence

View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.

Result No.: 20250723153349176172897 Owner: publicuser Comments: 0
FTIR Analysis Report Low confidence

Unsaturated ester / vinyl acetate type polymer with methyl/methoxy groups and possible aromatic components; low library confidence

Sample & Measurement Parameters

Report No. 20250723153349176172897
Date
Spectral Range (cm⁻¹) N/A
Baseline AsLS baseline correction
Library match 29%

Identification Result

29%

The sample shows spectral features consistent with an unsaturated ester or acetate‑containing material, possibly a vinyl acetate copolymer or a low‑molecular‑weight acetate ester, but the identification remains uncertain. The reference library comparison lists prop‑2‑enyl acetate (similarity 15%) and a vinyl chloride/vinyl acetate copolymer as the nearest matches; however, the spectrum lacks a prominent C=O stretch near 1730 cm⁻¹, and many peak assignments vary with literature context. Aliphatic hydrocarbon chains, C–O single bond stretches, acetate‑related vibrations, and aromatic =C–H/C=C modes are present, suggesting a complex organic mixture or a partially degraded oligomer. Related literature reports porphyrin‑like ring vibrations for certain low‑wavenumber bands, raising further uncertainty. The result is therefore broadened to the chemically supportable class of unsaturated ester polymers with methyl/methoxy components FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.

Detailed interpretation

  • Top library match: prop-2-enyl acetate #70
  • The library match is very low (0.000 distance, 15% confidence), indicating poor overall spectral similarity to prop‑2‑enyl acetate.
  • A typical ester carbonyl stretching band (≈1735 cm⁻¹) is absent; prop‑2‑enyl acetate should exhibit a strong C=O stretch that is not detected.
  • The material direction remains tentative because the library hit is low and multiple functional‑group assignments are generic (alkyl C–H, C–O, aromatic C–H) rather than specific to a single compound or polymer type.
  • The absence of a clear carbonyl band makes it difficult to confirm an acetate or methacrylate structure definitively.
  • The porphyrin‑related literature analogies add complexity that cannot be resolved with the existing FTIR data alone.

Recommended next steps: Perform a high‑quality ATR‑FTIR measurement with better signal‑to‑noise ratio and extended scan time to verify the presence or absence of a weak carbonyl band. Obtain complementary structural information via GC‑MS, LC‑MS, or NMR to identify the molecular composition, especially if the sample is a mixture. Expand the library search by using a dedicated polymer or ester spectral database, and consider pyrolysis‑GC‑FTIR if the sample is intractable.

Library Comparison

Library spectrum will appear here.

Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates

Rank Match % Compound SMILES Spectrum No. Action
Loading library candidates...

Peak Analysis

★ = Literature-supported assignment
# Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) Absorbance Assignment Citation Assignment status
1 · 728 1.00 - - -
2 · 796 0.83 - - -
3 · 748 0.80 - - -
4 · 1079 0.65 - - -
5 · 1383 0.57 - - -
6 · 1320 0.40 - - -
7 · 1614 0.39 - - -
8 · 1145 0.35 - - -
9 · 1498 0.33 - - -
10 · 1200 0.31 - - -
11 · 1022 0.29 - - -
12 · 3047 0.26 - - -
13 · 905 0.25 - - -
14 · 1452 0.24 - - -
15 · 931 0.21 - - -
16 · 988 0.18 - - -
17 · 1250 0.14 - - -

Appendix — Raw Spectrum

Raw sample spectrum
Generated by FTIR.fun — Report #20250723153349176172897
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

Submit Requirement Form