View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
The sample shows spectral features consistent with an unsaturated ester or acetate‑containing material, possibly a vinyl acetate copolymer or a low‑molecular‑weight acetate ester, but the identification remains uncertain. The reference library comparison lists prop‑2‑enyl acetate (similarity 15%) and a vinyl chloride/vinyl acetate copolymer as the nearest matches; however, the spectrum lacks a prominent C=O stretch near 1730 cm⁻¹, and many peak assignments vary with literature context. Aliphatic hydrocarbon chains, C–O single bond stretches, acetate‑related vibrations, and aromatic =C–H/C=C modes are present, suggesting a complex organic mixture or a partially degraded oligomer. Related literature reports porphyrin‑like ring vibrations for certain low‑wavenumber bands, raising further uncertainty. The result is therefore broadened to the chemically supportable class of unsaturated ester polymers with methyl/methoxy components FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.
Recommended next steps: Perform a high‑quality ATR‑FTIR measurement with better signal‑to‑noise ratio and extended scan time to verify the presence or absence of a weak carbonyl band. Obtain complementary structural information via GC‑MS, LC‑MS, or NMR to identify the molecular composition, especially if the sample is a mixture. Expand the library search by using a dedicated polymer or ester spectral database, and consider pyrolysis‑GC‑FTIR if the sample is intractable.
| Rank | Match % | Compound | SMILES | Spectrum No. | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading library candidates... | |||||
| # | Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) | Absorbance | Assignment | Citation | Assignment status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | · | 728 | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| 2 | · | 796 | 0.83 | - | - | - |
| 3 | · | 748 | 0.80 | - | - | - |
| 4 | · | 1079 | 0.65 | - | - | - |
| 5 | · | 1383 | 0.57 | - | - | - |
| 6 | · | 1320 | 0.40 | - | - | - |
| 7 | · | 1614 | 0.39 | - | - | - |
| 8 | · | 1145 | 0.35 | - | - | - |
| 9 | · | 1498 | 0.33 | - | - | - |
| 10 | · | 1200 | 0.31 | - | - | - |
| 11 | · | 1022 | 0.29 | - | - | - |
| 12 | · | 3047 | 0.26 | - | - | - |
| 13 | · | 905 | 0.25 | - | - | - |
| 14 | · | 1452 | 0.24 | - | - | - |
| 15 | · | 931 | 0.21 | - | - | - |
| 16 | · | 988 | 0.18 | - | - | - |
| 17 | · | 1250 | 0.14 | - | - | - |
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.
FTIR.fun