View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
The FTIR search does not support a firm compound-level identification for this sample. The nearest library entry is 2-methyl-3-oxo-3-phenylpropanenitrile, but the match confidence is effectively absent, so that name should be treated only as the top library hit rather than a confirmed assignment. The observed spectrum is more safely described as an aromatic organic material containing a strong carbonyl band, with additional fingerprint-region bands consistent with C-O-containing functionality and substituted aromatic ring vibrations
Recommended next steps: Inspect the full spectrum, especially 3600-2500 cm-1 and 2300-2100 cm-1, to check for O-H and nitrile bands that would strongly refine the assignment. Compare the sample directly against reference spectra for aromatic esters, aromatic ketones, and aromatic carbonate-containing materials, since these are more consistent with the observed carbonyl and C-O pattern than the nominal top hit alone. If available, run complementary GC-MS or LC-MS for a small-molecule sample, or Raman/ATR-FTIR comparison against known polymer/additive standards if the sample is from a formulated material. Verify whether the paired 1724/1698 cm-1 feature persists across repeat measurements; if S-O, consider the possibility of multiple components or conjugated carbonyl environments.
| Rank | Match % | Compound | SMILES | Spectrum No. | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading library candidates... | |||||
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.
FTIR.fun
The above shows the FTIR analysis results of a pdf file uploaded by a user from Brazil . The original image is displayed below.
CSV file :tem.csv
en&2