FTIR.fun FTIR.fun Làm cho phân tích FTIR dễ dàng hơn
TRANG KẾT QUẢ

oxygenated aliphatic ether material, possibly polyether-like or glycol-ether-like

Xem báo cáo ở trên. Sử dụng các bình luận bên dưới nếu cần thảo luận thêm.

Số kết quả: 20250602120435185165783 Chủ sở hữu: publicuser Bình luận: 0
  • Translating report into Tiếng Việt. English is shown for now.
FTIR ANALYSIS REPORT

FTIR Spectrum Analysis Report

No.: 20250602120435185165783 Date: 2025-06-02 17:07:30 Reported by: FTIR.fun Contact: [email protected]

Download a professional, formatted PDF of this analysis.

Top15

Similarity-ranked Top-15 library comparison

Choose matching result groups:
Library spectrum will appear here.
Library spectrum Interactive sample curve Move the pointer to show the vertical guide line.
Top 15 candidates

Reference library candidates

Rank Match % Compound Name Formula / SMILES Library preview Action
Reference candidates load with this Top-15 workbench.

Based on the library matches and evidence above.

Conclusion

oxygenated aliphatic ether material, possibly polyether-like or glycol-ether-like

General assessment
-
#74696 Initial rank 1 Current rank 1 Library lead match 0.0%
Conclusion
  1. Top-15 library consensus points to methyl / oxygen chemistry.
  2. Several leading candidates are polyethers or glycol ethers, including Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether), Poly(ethylene oxide), and methoxyethoxy/ethoxyethoxy compounds.
  3. The 1093 cm-1 band is consistent with prominent C-O stretching expected for ether-rich materials.
Main limitation

A distinct band at 1728 cm-1 suggests a carbonyl group, which is not a characteristic identifying feature of simple Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether) or Poly(ethylene oxide).

Evidence & interpretation
Evidence

Key evidence

Kết quả khớp hàng đầu từ thư viện
Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether) #74696 | match 0.0%
Hướng vật liệu
oxygenated aliphatic ether material, possibly polyether-like or glycol-ether-like The FTIR pattern is most consistent with an oxygen-containing aliphatic material dominated by C-O bonding, with a broad direction toward a polyether-like or glycol-ether-like composition rather than a firm identification as a specific named compound. The leading library hit is Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether), and the top-ranked library pattern is largely populated by ether-rich oxygenated molecules, but the overall match strength is extremely weak and there is no direct literature confirmation for this sample. The observed bands at 1093 and 1247 cm-1 support substantial C-O single-bond character, while 2867 and 1450 cm-1 are compatible with aliphatic C-H. However, the band at 1728 cm-1 indicates a carbonyl-containing component that is not well explained by a simple polyethylene glycol methyl ether assignment, so the safest conclusion is a broader oxygenated ether-containing material direction.
Support

Evidence supporting the conclusion

Only sample-relevant statements that support the present conclusion are shown here.

  1. The FTIR pattern is most consistent with an oxygen-containing aliphatic material dominated by C-O bonding, with a broad direction toward a polyether-like or glycol-ether-like composition rather than a firm identification as a specific named compound. The leading library hit is Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether), and the top-ranked library pattern is largely populated by ether-rich oxygenated molecules, but the overall match strength is extremely weak and there is no direct literature confirmation for this sample. The observed bands at 1093 and 1247 cm-1 support substantial C-O single-bond character, while 2867 and 1450 cm-1 are compatible with aliphatic C-H. However, the band at 1728 cm-1 indicates a carbonyl-containing component that is not well explained by a simple polyethylene glycol methyl ether assignment, so the safest conclusion is a broader oxygenated ether-containing material direction.
  2. Top-15 library consensus points to methyl / oxygen chemistry.
  3. Several leading candidates are polyethers or glycol ethers, including Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether), Poly(ethylene oxide), and methoxyethoxy/ethoxyethoxy compounds.
  4. The 1093 cm-1 band is consistent with prominent C-O stretching expected for ether-rich materials.
  5. The 1247 cm-1 band also supports oxygenated aliphatic C-O bonding.
  6. The 2867 and 1450 cm-1 bands are compatible with alkyl C-H vibrations in an aliphatic oxygenated matrix.
  7. The strongest common pattern across the leading library candidates is oxygenated aliphatic chemistry with repeated ether-type C-O linkages and alkyl groups.
  8. Bands at 1093 and 1247 cm-1 are characteristic of strong C-O stretching in ethers or related oxygenated aliphatic materials.
  9. Bands at 2867 and 1450 cm-1 support the presence of aliphatic C-H from methyl and/or methylene groups.
  10. The leading library name is Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether), but the reported similarity values are all 0.000, so the retrieval does not provide a reliable compound-level match.
  11. The 1728 cm-1 band indicates a carbonyl-containing feature that pushes the interpretation beyond a simple unsubstituted polyether.
Limitations

Evidence that limits the conclusion

  • A distinct band at 1728 cm-1 suggests a carbonyl group, which is not a characteristic identifying feature of simple Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether) or Poly(ethylene oxide).
  • All listed library similarities are 0.000, which means the retrieval is not strong enough for a secure entity-level assignment.
  • Minor library candidates include chemically different species such as silicate and halogenated compounds, indicating poor library specificity.
  • It remains unclear whether the carbonyl band belongs to the main material, an end group, an additive, a degradation product, or a mixture component.
  • The current peak set is too sparse to distinguish confidently between a polymeric polyether, a lower-mass glycol ether, or a more complex oxygenated formulation.
  • Because the library match is weak and literature support is absent, the named library hit should be treated only as a tentative nearest neighbor, not a confirmed identification.
Recommendation

Suggested next verification

  • Recollect the FTIR spectrum over the full range with improved signal quality, especially to confirm the carbonyl region near 1728 cm-1 and the C-O fingerprint region from about 1000 to 1300 cm-1.
  • Check for the presence or absence of a broad O-H band in the 3200-3600 cm-1 region to distinguish hydroxylated glycol ethers from capped polyethers.
  • Compare the sample against authenticated spectra of Poly(ethylene glycol methyl ether), Poly(ethylene oxide), and representative glycol ethers under the same measurement conditions.
  • If available, use complementary GC-MS or LC-MS for lower-mass glycol ethers, or NMR and SEC/GPC if a polymeric polyether is suspected.
Peak analysis

Detected peaks and interpretation

★ = Literature-supported peak assignment.

Index Characteristic Wavenumber Absorbance Evidence One-line interpretation Citation Confidence
1 · 1093 1.00 - - - -
2 · 1728 0.38 - - - -
3 · 947 0.35 - - - -
4 · 848 0.31 - - - -
5 · 1247 0.28 - - - -
6 · 2867 0.27 - - - -
7 · 1348 0.22 - - - -
8 · 1450 0.20 - - - -
Appendix

Sample information and raw spectrum

Original uploaded spectrum for reference and verification.

Baseline correction method: Asymmetric Least Squares Smoothing

The wavelength range for analysis(cm-1): [(650, 4000)]

Raw spectrum without baseline correction or other processing:

Sample spectrum image
Thảo luận

Bình luận và bằng chứng tiếp theo

Sử dụng khu vực này để tiếp tục giải thích, đặt câu hỏi hoặc thêm bằng chứng xác minh bổ sung.

  • Trang 1 của 1
Trả lời
CHỦ ĐỀ LIÊN QUAN

Các phân tích khác trong danh mục này

Gửi Yêu cầu Biểu mẫu