View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
The FTIR pattern is most consistent with a styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer, with Polystyrene as the nearest library match. This direction is supported by aromatic C-H stretching near 3031-3081 cm-1, aromatic ring bands at 1604 and 1493 cm-1, strong out-of-plane aromatic C-H bands at 701, 751, and 758 cm-1, and aliphatic C-H stretches at 2926 and 2857 cm-1, which together are characteristic of a phenyl-substituted hydrocarbon polymer. However, the library confidence is very low and no direct reference or related-literature evidence independently confirms a specific entity assignment, so the most defensible conclusion is a styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer direction rather than a firm entity identification
Recommended next steps: Compare the sample directly against a verified Polystyrene reference spectrum collected under the same ATR or transmission conditions, focusing on the relative intensities and exact positions of the 1604, 1493, 758, and 701 cm-1 bands. Inspect the full spectrum for the typical styrenic fingerprint-region pattern and for any weak heteroatom-associated bands that could indicate additives, oxidation, or copolymerization. If a firmer identification is needed, use complementary methods such as Raman spectroscopy, DSC or TGA, or pyrolysis-GC/MS to distinguish Polystyrene from other styrenic polymers or blends. If the sample is a manufactured article, analyze a cleaned interior cross-section to reduce interference from surface coatings, weathering, or contamination.
| Rank | Match % | Compound | SMILES | Spectrum No. | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading library candidates... | |||||
| # | Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) | Absorbance | Assignment | Citation | Assignment status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | · | 701 | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| 2 | · | 2926 | 0.92 | - | - | - |
| 3 | · | 1450 | 0.91 | - | - | - |
| 4 | · | 3031 | 0.91 | - | - | - |
| 5 | · | 751 | 0.83 | - | - | - |
| 6 | · | 758 | 0.71 | - | - | - |
| 7 | · | 1493 | 0.41 | - | - | - |
| 8 | · | 3071 | 0.37 | - | - | - |
| 9 | · | 3081 | 0.33 | - | - | - |
| 10 | · | 2857 | 0.31 | - | - | - |
| 11 | · | 1604 | 0.28 | - | - | - |
| 12 | · | 1025 | 0.20 | - | - | - |
| 13 | · | 903 | 0.14 | - | - | - |
| 14 | · | 1070 | 0.13 | - | - | - |
| 15 | · | 1360 | 0.11 | - | - | - |
| 16 | · | 1376 | 0.11 | - | - | - |
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.
FTIR.fun
The user from Taiwan (IP: 2407::) uploaded a DOCX file containing three IR spectra. Swipe up to view the qualitative analysis of the first spectrum. The user also expressed intent to calculate sample thickness using interference peaks. Based on the spectra, the analysis was performed at wave numbers 2501 and 2563, yielding an interference peak difference (V₁ - V₂) of 62 cm-1 and ΔN = 1. By inputting the film's refractive index(n), the sample thickness (d) was determined.Here is the original spectrum of the sample extracted from the DOCX file.
en&2