RESULT PAGE

styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer

View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.

Result No.: 20250423235425107656881-1 Owner: publicuser Comments: 1
FTIR Analysis Report

styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer

Sample & Measurement Parameters

Report No. 20250423235425107656881-1
Date 2025-04-24 03:39:06
Spectral Range (cm⁻¹) [(650, 4000)]
Baseline AsLS baseline correction
Library match 0%

Identification Result

0%

The FTIR pattern is most consistent with a styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer, with Polystyrene as the nearest library match. This direction is supported by aromatic C-H stretching near 3031-3081 cm-1, aromatic ring bands at 1604 and 1493 cm-1, strong out-of-plane aromatic C-H bands at 701, 751, and 758 cm-1, and aliphatic C-H stretches at 2926 and 2857 cm-1, which together are characteristic of a phenyl-substituted hydrocarbon polymer. However, the library confidence is very low and no direct reference or related-literature evidence independently confirms a specific entity assignment, so the most defensible conclusion is a styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer direction rather than a firm entity identification

Detailed interpretation

  • Top library match: Polystyrene #46662
  1. The FTIR pattern is most consistent with a styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer, with Polystyrene as the nearest library match. This direction is supported by aromatic C-H stretching near 3031-3081 cm-1, aromatic ring bands at 1604 and 1493 cm-1, strong out-of-plane aromatic C-H bands at 701, 751, and 758 cm-1, and aliphatic C-H stretches at 2926 and 2857 cm-1, which together are characteristic of a phenyl-substituted hydrocarbon polymer. However, the library confidence is very low and no direct reference or related-literature evidence independently confirms a specific entity assignment, S-O the most defensible conclusion is a styrenic aromatic hydrocarbon polymer direction rather than a firm entity identification.
  • The library match confidence is reported as low, S-O the retrieval alone is not strong enough for a firm material identification.
  • No related-literature match was recovered to narrow the assignment beyond a styrenic aromatic polymer direction.
  • The reported evidence does not establish whether the material is pure Polystyrene or a related styrenic material, blend, copolymer, or modified form.
  • The present evidence supports styrenic aromatic chemistry but does not securely distinguish Polystyrene from closely related styrenic polymer materials.
  • Minor bands such as 903, 1025, and 1070 cm-1 are not sufficient here to prove a more specific formulation without stronger reference support.
  • Because direct literature and reference confirmation are absent, the entity-level assignment remains less certain than the broad chemical direction.

Recommended next steps: Compare the sample directly against a verified Polystyrene reference spectrum collected under the same ATR or transmission conditions, focusing on the relative intensities and exact positions of the 1604, 1493, 758, and 701 cm-1 bands. Inspect the full spectrum for the typical styrenic fingerprint-region pattern and for any weak heteroatom-associated bands that could indicate additives, oxidation, or copolymerization. If a firmer identification is needed, use complementary methods such as Raman spectroscopy, DSC or TGA, or pyrolysis-GC/MS to distinguish Polystyrene from other styrenic polymers or blends. If the sample is a manufactured article, analyze a cleaned interior cross-section to reduce interference from surface coatings, weathering, or contamination.

Library Comparison

Match group:
Library spectrum will appear here.

Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates

Rank Match % Compound SMILES Spectrum No. Action
Loading library candidates...

Peak Analysis

★ = Literature-supported assignment
# Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) Absorbance Assignment Citation Assignment status
1 · 701 1.00 - - -
2 · 2926 0.92 - - -
3 · 1450 0.91 - - -
4 · 3031 0.91 - - -
5 · 751 0.83 - - -
6 · 758 0.71 - - -
7 · 1493 0.41 - - -
8 · 3071 0.37 - - -
9 · 3081 0.33 - - -
10 · 2857 0.31 - - -
11 · 1604 0.28 - - -
12 · 1025 0.20 - - -
13 · 903 0.14 - - -
14 · 1070 0.13 - - -
15 · 1360 0.11 - - -
16 · 1376 0.11 - - -

Appendix — Raw Spectrum

Raw sample spectrum
Generated by FTIR.fun — Report #20250423235425107656881-1 2025-04-24 03:39:06
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

The user from Taiwan (IP: 2407::) uploaded a DOCX file containing three IR spectra. Swipe up to view the qualitative analysis of the first spectrum. The user also expressed intent to calculate sample thickness using interference peaks. Based on the spectra, the analysis was performed at wave numbers 2501 and 2563, yielding an interference peak difference (V₁ - V₂) of 62 cm-1 and ΔN = 1. By inputting the film's refractive index(n), the sample thickness (d) was determined.Here is the original spectrum of the sample extracted from the DOCX file.1.png

en&2
Submit Requirement Form