View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
The FTIR pattern is most consistent with an oxygen-containing ester material, likely a polymeric or oligomeric species rather than a simple hydrocarbon. The strongest sample evidence is the carbonyl region at 1708 and 1725 cm-1 together with multiple C-O stretching bands at 1055, 1098, 1165, 1178, 1240, and 1285 cm-1, plus aliphatic C-H at 2935 cm-1 and a broad O-H/N-H region near 3373 cm-1. The library top hit is Poly(caprolactone),monohydroxy terminated, and the broader top-candidate pattern is dominated by oxygenated ester polymers such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate- and polyester-type materials. However, the library match quality is very weak, and no direct or related literature evidence independently confirms a specific named polymer. For that reason, the most supportable conclusion is a broader oxygen-containing ester polymer or oligomer direction, with possible hydroxyl termination, rather than a firm assignment to Poly(caprolactone),monohydroxy terminated
Recommended next steps: Compare the full spectrum directly against authenticated FTIR references for Poly(caprolactone),monohydroxy terminated, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), and common aliphatic polyesters such as poly(trimethylene succinate). Check for polyester-specific thermal behavior by DSC; a melting transition near the expected range for semicrystalline aliphatic polyester would help separate polycaprolactone-like material from methacrylate-based materials. Use 1H and 13C NMR to verify whether the sample contains caprolactone-type methylene environments, methacrylate backbone features, or mixed ester components. If the 3373 cm-1 band is important to the assignment, dry the sample and reacquire FTIR to determine whether the band persists as a true hydroxyl feature rather than adsorbed moisture.
| Rank | Match % | Compound | SMILES | Spectrum No. | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading library candidates... | |||||
| # | Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) | Absorbance | Assignment | Citation | Assignment status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | · | 1725 | 1.00 | - | - | - |
| 2 | · | 1165 | 0.94 | - | - | - |
| 3 | · | 1178 | 0.90 | - | - | - |
| 4 | · | 1708 | 0.48 | - | - | - |
| 5 | · | 718 | 0.44 | - | - | - |
| 6 | · | 1240 | 0.33 | - | - | - |
| 7 | · | 3373 | 0.30 | - | - | - |
| 8 | · | 1055 | 0.29 | - | - | - |
| 9 | · | 1098 | 0.27 | - | - | - |
| 10 | · | 960 | 0.21 | - | - | - |
| 11 | · | 1285 | 0.20 | - | - | - |
| 12 | · | 1362 | 0.18 | - | - | - |
| 13 | · | 2935 | 0.16 | - | - | - |
| 14 | · | 1462 | 0.13 | - | - | - |
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.
FTIR.fun
This is the FTIR analysis result of a jpeg file uploaded by a user with IP 39.XX.XXX.109 The original image is shown below.
en&2