View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
The current FTIR evidence does not support a firm identification as Boric acid despite that library entry appearing first, because the library match quality is effectively absent and the observed bands are not characteristic of a simple boric acid spectrum. Instead, the sample is more cautiously described as a nitrogen-containing organic material, with a strong possibility of nitrile functionality and at least one N-H or hydrogen-bonded O-H containing group
Recommended next steps: Reacquire the FTIR spectrum with full fingerprint-region quality and confirm whether additional bands appear near 1700-1600 cm-1 and 1300-1000 cm-1 to distinguish amide, carboxylate, borate, and other heteroatom-containing groups. Inspect the 2260 cm-1 feature at higher signal-to-noise to confirm whether it is a true characteristic nitrile band rather than an artifact or atmospheric contribution. If this sample may be polymeric, compare against reference spectra of nitrile-containing and amide-containing materials, especially benzonitrile-like or acrylamide-related materials. Use complementary elemental screening such as EDS, XRF, or combustion/CHN analysis to test whether boron is actually present; absence of boron would further rule out the library-leading boric acid suggestion.
| Rank | Match % | Compound | SMILES | Spectrum No. | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading library candidates... | |||||
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.
FTIR.fun
This is the FTIR analysis result of a JPG file uploaded by a user with IP 99.X.XXX.92. The original image is shown below.
en&2