REZULTĀTU LAPA

aromatic ester material, plausibly a terephthalate-type polyester

Skatiet ziņojumu augstāk. Izmantojiet zemāk esošos komentārus, ja nepieciešama papildu diskusija.

Rezultāta Nr.: 20241029163110693788775 Īpašnieks: publicuser Komentāri: 0
  • Translating report into Latviešu. English is shown for now.
FTIR ANALYSIS REPORT

FTIR Spectrum Analysis Report

No.: 20241029163110693788775 Date: 2024-10-29 15:32:50 Reported by: FTIR.fun Contact: [email protected]

Download a professional, formatted PDF of this analysis.

Top15

Similarity-ranked Top-15 library comparison

Choose matching result groups:
Library spectrum will appear here.
Library spectrum Interactive sample curve Move the pointer to show the vertical guide line.
Top 15 candidates

Reference library candidates

Rank Match % Compound Name Formula / SMILES Library preview Action
Reference candidates load with this Top-15 workbench.

Based on the library matches and evidence above.

Conclusion

aromatic ester material, plausibly a terephthalate-type polyester

-
Conclusion
  1. Top library candidates are dominated by Poly(1,4-butylene terephthalate) and tere-/isophthalic polyester entries.
  2. Additional leading candidates such as propyl benzoate, diethyl benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate, and phenylmethyl benzoate reinforce a common aromatic ester motif.
  3. The sample contains the expected ester-defining bands: carbonyl at 1714 cm-1 and multiple C-O bands between 1270 and 1015 cm-1.
Evidence & interpretation
Evidence

Key evidence

Bibliotēkas vadošā atbilstība
Poly(1,4-butylene terephthalate) #28876
Limitations

Evidence that limits the conclusion

  • The library confidence is low, with no numerical separation among candidates and all reported similarities at 0.000.
  • No related-literature evidence was recovered to verify a specific polymer such as Poly(1,4-butylene terephthalate).
  • The present peak list does not provide enough sample-specific distinguishing bands to safely separate one terephthalate polyester from other aromatic ester materials.
  • A terephthalate-type polyester is plausible, but a firm entity-level assignment to Poly(1,4-butylene terephthalate) is not supported by the current evidence alone.
  • The spectrum could also reflect another aromatic polyester or related benzoate-containing ester material within the same chemical direction.
  • Key uncertainty remains because the result is driven mainly by a broad aromatic-ester library pattern rather than confirmed literature support.
Recommendation

Suggested next verification

  • Re-measure the FTIR spectrum with full spectral review, especially the 1600-1500 cm-1 aromatic ring region and the 1300-700 cm-1 fingerprint region, to look for terephthalate-specific band patterning.
  • Compare the sample directly against authenticated spectra of Poly(1,4-butylene terephthalate), PET-type terephthalate polyesters, and isophthalate-containing polyesters.
  • If the sample is a bulk solid or plastic, DSC can help test for a polyester such as PBT by checking for characteristic melting and crystallization behavior.
  • If compositional confirmation is needed, pyrolysis-GC/MS or complementary Raman analysis would help distinguish a specific terephthalate polyester from other aromatic ester materials.
Peak analysis

Detected peaks and interpretation

★ = Literature-supported peak assignment.

Need formal wording and manual review? Upgrade to reviewed report
Index Characteristic Wavenumber Absorbance Evidence One-line interpretation Citation Confidence
1 · 1714 1.00 - - - -
2 · 1270 0.94 - - - -
3 · 1102 0.67 - - - -
4 · 1115 0.52 - - - -
5 · 725 0.33 - - - -
6 · 1015 0.20 - - - -
7 · 2856 0.20 - - - -
8 · 2943 0.20 - - - -
9 · 1406 0.19 - - - -
10 · 1453 0.14 - - - -
11 · 1383 0.13 - - - -
Expert Review Upgrade

Need a formal reviewed report instead of the standard result page?

The current result page and PDF export are automated outputs. Our Expert-Reviewed Formal Report is a separate manual service that can refine wording, check peak assignments and references, and deliver a formal report package for publication drafting, client reporting, or internal QC records.

  • Manual review of peak assignments, references, and conclusion boundaries
  • Formal report wording for sharing with clients, colleagues, or manuscript drafts
  • Optional FTIR.fun electronic seal confirmation on the reviewed report

This reviewed report is an FTIR.fun confirmation document. It does not replace accredited laboratory certification or legal/regulatory conclusions.

Request Expert-Reviewed Formal Report

Your request will be linked to result 20241029163110693788775 so you do not need to explain the result from scratch.

Appendix

Sample information and raw spectrum

Original uploaded spectrum for reference and verification.

Baseline correction method: Asymmetric Least Squares Smoothing

The wavelength range for analysis(cm-1): [(650, 4000)]

Raw spectrum without baseline correction or other processing:

Sample spectrum image
Diskusija

Komentāri un papildu pierādījumi

Izmantojiet šo apgabalu, lai turpinātu interpretāciju, uzdotu jautājumus vai pievienotu papildu pārbaudes pierādījumus.

Iesniegt pieprasījumu Veidlapa