RESULT PAGE

organically modified dioctahedral smectite clay with long-chain aliphatic amide/ester modifier

View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.

Result No.: 20260417114433479869516 Owner: debolina Comments: 0
FTIR Analysis Report Moderate confidence

organically modified dioctahedral smectite clay with long-chain aliphatic amide/ester modifier

Sample & Measurement Parameters

Report No. 20260417114433479869516
Date
Spectral Range (cm⁻¹) N/A
Baseline AsLS baseline correction
Library match 69%

Identification Result

69%

The infrared spectrum exhibits bands characteristic of a dioctahedral aluminosilicate smectite clay mineral (e.g., Al OH bending at 683 and 913 cm⁻¹, external tetrahedral Si O vibrations near 745 cm⁻¹) superimposed with strong organic absorptions. The organic contribution displays long-chain aliphatic C–H stretches at 2919 and 2850 cm⁻¹, an ester carbonyl at 1740 cm⁻¹, amide I and II bands at 1642 and 1549 cm⁻¹, and aromatic C–H out-of-plane modes at 704 and 722 cm⁻¹. This pattern is most consistent with an organically modified clay, where the organic modifier bears amide and ester (methacrylate/methoxy) functionality, aligning with the moderate library match to a tetradecanamide-like pattern and the Top‑15 consensus of methoxy/methacrylate chemistry FTIR In-Depth Interpretation was not selected for this task, so this section shows the library-search result only and no deep AI interpretation was run.

Detailed interpretation

  • Top library match: Tetradecanamide #29857
  1. The infrared spectrum exhibits bands characteristic of a dioctahedral aluminosilicate smectite clay mineral (e.g., Al O-H bending at 683 and 913 cm⁻¹, external tetrahedral Si-O vibrations near 745 cm⁻¹) superimposed with strong organic absorptions. The organic contribution displays long-chain aliphatic C–H stretches at 2919 and 2850 cm⁻¹, an ester carbonyl at 1740 cm⁻¹, amide I and II bands at 1642 and 1549 cm⁻¹, and aromatic C–H out-of-plane modes at 704 and 722 cm⁻¹. This pattern is most consistent with an organically modified clay, where the organic modifier bears amide and ester (methacrylate/methoxy) functionality, aligning with the moderate library match to a tetradecanamide-like pattern and the Top‑15 consensus of methoxy/methacrylate chemistry.
  • The presence of a strong ester carbonyl at 1740 cm⁻¹ contradicts a pure tetradecanamide identification, which would exhibit amide C=O at lower frequency (≈1650 cm⁻¹) and lack a distinct ester band.
  • The dominant clay mineral absorptions are not represented in the library's top organic candidates, indicating that the organic hit describes only the modifier fraction.
  • The exact chemical structure of the organic modifier (e.g., a specific methacrylate polymer, a fatty acid amide mixture, or a plasticizer) cannot be conclusively determined from the FTIR data alone.
  • Band overlap in the C–O/Si–O region (≈1000–1100 cm⁻¹) prevents clear differentiation between clay silicate and organic ether/ester C–O contributions.

Recommended next steps: Perform X-ray diffraction (XRD) to identify the clay mineral type and confirm the smectite structure. Conduct thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) or solvent extraction to isolate the organic modifier for separate identification by GC‑MS or NMR. Acquire a higher-resolution IR spectrum or use spectral subtraction with a pure clay spectrum to resolve overlapping organic and inorganic bands.

Library Comparison

Library spectrum will appear here.

Library Search Results — Top 15 Candidates

Rank Match % Compound SMILES Spectrum No. Action
Loading library candidates...

Peak Analysis

★ = Literature-supported assignment
# Wavenumber (cm⁻¹) Absorbance Assignment Citation Assignment status
1 · 1740 0.93 - - -
2 · 2919 0.83 - - -
3 · 1642 0.77 - - -
4 · 2850 0.61 - - -
5 · 692 0.44 - - -
6 · 675 0.42 - - -
7 · 683 0.41 - - -
8 · 1160 0.41 - - -
9 · 722 0.41 - - -
10 · 704 0.40 - - -
11 · 3419 0.38 - - -
12 · 3386 0.37 - - -
13 · 3446 0.36 - - -
14 · 3231 0.36 - - -
15 · 745 0.35 - - -
16 · 3268 0.35 - - -
17 · 1096 0.34 - - -
18 · 3502 0.34 - - -
19 · 3289 0.33 - - -
20 · 3526 0.33 - - -
21 · 3458 0.33 - - -
22 · 763 0.33 - - -
23 · 3481 0.32 - - -
24 · 754 0.32 - - -
25 · 3509 0.32 - - -
26 · 3313 0.31 - - -
27 · 781 0.31 - - -
28 · 3304 0.30 - - -
29 · 788 0.30 - - -
30 · 1549 0.28 - - -
31 · 1462 0.28 - - -
32 · 810 0.28 - - -
33 · 820 0.28 - - -
34 · 835 0.27 - - -
35 · 1032 0.27 - - -
36 · 847 0.25 - - -
37 · 867 0.23 - - -
38 · 974 0.16 - - -
39 · 913 0.15 - - -
40 · 1237 0.15 - - -
41 · 2164 0.14 - - -
42 · 2037 0.13 - - -
43 · 2174 0.13 - - -
44 · 1930 0.12 - - -
45 · 2044 0.12 - - -
46 · 2016 0.12 - - -
47 · 2024 0.12 - - -
48 · 1990 0.12 - - -
49 · 2072 0.11 - - -
50 · 2150 0.11 - - -
51 · 1945 0.11 - - -
52 · 2128 0.11 - - -
53 · 2108 0.11 - - -
54 · 2087 0.11 - - -
55 · 2064 0.10 - - -
56 · 2054 0.10 - - -
57 · 2208 0.10 - - -
58 · 1965 0.10 - - -

Appendix — Raw Spectrum

Raw sample spectrum
Generated by FTIR.fun — Report #20260417114433479869516
Discussion

Comments and follow-up evidence

Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.

Submit Requirement Form