What absorbs at 645 cm⁻¹ in an FTIR spectrum?
A band near 645 cm⁻¹ can point to several functional groups. Below are the most likely assignments, ranked by how much published evidence supports each — every one traceable to literature (DOI) and cross-validated against our 130,000+ reference spectra and knowledge graph.
Backed by 3 cited sources
Quick answer
A band near 645 cm⁻¹ is usually interpreted by checking which functional groups repeatedly co-occur there in the literature, then confirming at least one or two additional peaks in the same sample. This page ranks those assignments by accumulated evidence rather than by a single fixed textbook rule.
可能性のある官能基アサイン
| 官能基 | 裏付け事実 | 引用元 | 最高信頼度 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary amine | 1 | 1 | 1.0 |
| N h | 1 | 1 | 1.0 |
| Metal oxygen | 1 | 1 | 1.0 |
| Bromine | 1 | 1 | 1.0 |
| Carbonate | 1 | 0 | 1.0 |
| C c single bond | 1 | 0 | 1.0 |
ランキングは蓄積された文献証拠を反映しており、単一の権威あるルールではありません。常にサンプルのコンテキストと照合して確認してください。
Possible materials
| 素材 | 補助ピーク | Overlapping groups | 引用元 |
|---|---|---|---|
| chitosan | 645, 1650, 1655 | N h | 1 |
| magnetite | 645, 1740, 1263 | Metal oxygen | 1 |
| iron oxide | 645, 1130, 891 | Metal oxygen | 1 |
Materials are shown only when the same literature pool supports this band and at least one additional characteristic peak.
Spectrum logic
This band becomes meaningful only when read with its neighboring peaks. In practice, analysts first look at the assignments above, then check whether the same sample also shows other peaks expected for the same structural motif. A lone band near 645 cm⁻¹ is usually not enough for material identification by itself.
Real-world usage
This type of query is common in polymer identification, unknown plastic screening, QC troubleshooting, recycled-material verification, and literature-backed peak assignment review.
Common mistakes
- Treating one isolated band as proof of a material without checking at least one or two supporting peaks.
- Ignoring overlap: multiple functional groups can contribute near the same wavenumber.
- Skipping validation when additives, blends, oxidation, or contamination may distort the spectrum.
Verification advice
When ambiguity remains, validate the hypothesis with DSC, GC-MS, or TGA, especially for blends, degraded samples, and filled polymers.
これらのアサインの根拠となる文献
-
Bromine 信頼度 1.0
“The cm(cid:0) Br-C 1 sensitive PLA-naringin coaxial electrospun fiber membrane, was stored absorption peaks at 645, 506, and 3500 were caused by the ◦C, Br-C”
Preparation of pH-sensitive polylactic acid-naringin coaxial electrospun fiber membranes for maintaining and monitoring salmon freshness DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.087 -
信頼度 1.0
“In Figure 2, the FTIR spectra reveal the three characteristic peaks at 552 cm-1, 645 cm-1, and 990 cm-1 which are attributed to the Fe-O bond [50].”
Yadav 等 - 2020 - Synthesis and Characterization of Amorphous Iron O DOI: 10.3390/nano10081551 -
N h 信頼度 1.0
“1,645cm-1 can be attributed to the -NH bending vibration Figure 3.”
Yakar 和 Dede - 2022 - Production and Characterization of Healing Polymer DOI: 10.3389/fmats.2022.910761
このバンドを持つスペクトルがありますか？
FTIRスペクトルをアップロードすると、数秒で完全な解釈レポート（文献引用付きピークアサイン、ライブラリマッチ、信頼度評価付き証拠チェーン）を取得できます。