View the report above. Use the comments below if you need follow-up discussion.
Download a professional, formatted PDF of this analysis.
| Rank | Match % | Compound Name | Formula / SMILES | Library preview | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference candidates load with this Top-15 workbench. | |||||
Based on the library matches and evidence above.
No limiting evidence was recorded.
No verification steps were suggested.
★ = Literature-supported peak assignment.
| Index | Characteristic | Wavenumber | Absorbance | Evidence | One-line interpretation | Citation | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | · | 3327 | 0.88 | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | · | 1634 | 0.45 | - | - | - | - |
The current result page and PDF export are automated outputs. Our Expert-Reviewed Formal Report is a separate manual service that can refine wording, check peak assignments and references, and deliver a formal report package for publication drafting, client reporting, or internal QC records.
This reviewed report is an FTIR.fun confirmation document. It does not replace accredited laboratory certification or legal/regulatory conclusions.
Your request will be linked to result 20250123102233397353889 so you do not need to explain the result from scratch.
Original uploaded spectrum for reference and verification.
The wavelength range for analysis(cm-1): The default is the full wavelength range in this mode
Raw spectrum without baseline correction or other processing:
Use this area to continue the interpretation, ask questions, or add extra verification evidence.
This result is the FTIR analysis of a .dpt file uploaded by a user with the IP address 14...214. It resembles water.Compared to sample 20250121104020356261783, the current sample lacks a strong absorption peak around 1395 cm^-1 and a weak absorption peak around 1050 cm^-1. These peaks may be caused by nitrate. This indicates that the current sample is mainly composed of water, whereas sample 20250121104020356261783 may also contain nitrate in addition to water.
en&2